Logo Logo Logo Logo Logo

In association with the International Commission of Jurists

  • Topics ↓
    • General
    • Use of Force
    • International Criminal Law
    • International Humanitarian Law
    • International Human Rights Law
    • Environmental Law
    • Trade & Economic Law
    • Law of the Sea
    • National Security Law
    • Foreign Relations Law
    • Organizations
  • Regions ↓
    • Africa
    • Asia-Pacific
    • Europe
    • Latin & South America
    • Middle East
    • North America
  • Announcements ↓
    • Events
    • Calls for Papers
    • Jobs
  • Symposia ↓
    • Books
    • Articles
    • Themes
  • Media ↓
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Contributors
  • Submissions
  • About
  • Donate
  • Fresh Squeezed! Podcast
  • Topics ↓

    • General
    • Use of Force
    • International Criminal Law
    • International Humanitarian Law
    • International Human Rights Law
    • Environmental Law
    • Trade & Economic Law
    • Law of the Sea
    • National Security Law
    • Foreign Relations Law
    • Organizations
  • Regions ↓

    • Africa
    • Asia-Pacific
    • Europe
    • Latin & South America
    • Middle East
    • North America
  • Announcements ↓

    • Events
    • Calls for Papers
    • Jobs
  • Symposia ↓

    • Books
    • Articles
    • Themes
  • Media ↓
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Contributors
  • Submissions
  • About
  • Donate
  • Fresh Squeezed! Podcast

Author: Abhishek Trivedi

26 Jan

It is in the Interest of India to Settle the Jadhav Matter (India v. Pakistan) through Diplomatic Methods

[Abhishek Trivedi holds an LLM in International Law from the South Asian University, and is currently working on his PhD at the South Asian University as well.] India should focus on negotiating to save Jadhav’s life through diplomatic channels as the remedy before Islamabad High Court (IHC) and subsequently before the International Court of justice (the ICJ or the Court) and the Security Council is inadequate. India...

Abhishek Trivedi | 0 Comments
Recent Posts
  • Symposium on Jurisdiction, Responsibility, and Temporality: Nicaragua v. Germany Before the ICJ – Temporality and Third-State Responsibility in Prolonged Occupations
  • Symposium on Jurisdiction, Responsibility, and Temporality: Nicaragua v. Germany Before the ICJ – Nicaragua’s Monetary Gold Problem (and its Solution)
  • Symposium on Jurisdiction, Responsibility, and Temporality: Nicaragua v. Germany Before the ICJ – The Monetary Gold Principle and Preliminary Objections in the Nicaragua v. Germany Case
  • Introduction to the Symposium on Jurisdiction, Responsibility and Temporality: Nicaragua v. Germany Before the ICJ
  • ‘To Destroy the Group Physically’? Part 3: Bosnia v. Serbia Beyond Paragraphs 190 and 344, External Context, and Implications

© Opinio Juris | Design by Open & Honest | In association with the International Commission of Jurists