Search: Symposium on the Functional Approach to the Law of Occupation

[Jeffrey L. Dunoff is the Laura H. Carnell Professor of Law at Temple University Beasley School of Law and Mark A. Pollack is professor of Political Science and Jean Monnet Chair ad personam at Temple University] We are very grateful to our friends at OJ for hosting this symposium, which we trust will continue the work begun in our recent edited volume, namely providing a critical assessment of the innovations and contributions, as well as the lacunae, biases and blind spots, of international law and international relations (IL/IR) scholarship. In...

and a group of institutions that responds to the conflict of our time. He begins by examining the “law of September 10,” that is, the overlapping techniques and regulations stemming from law enforcement, intelligence operations, and warfighting, that have defined our complex responses to terrorism in the past, ranging from Federal trials to cruise-missile attacks. This actually mirrors how many law schools teach the course “National Security Law”: we pull together a smorgasbord of constitutional law, criminal law, the law of armed conflict, international criminal law, foreign relations law, and...

Dune universe between the “cynical rule by law” of the old Imperium and the “earnest rule of law” among the Fremen – a distinction which Paul himself appears to notice, and which begins to blur as the Fremen, now liberated by the events of Dune Messiah, grow increasingly seduced by the formalism and cynicism which characterised the Imperium. The Great Convention is the most obvious example of the former rule by law, prioritising form over substance. Each Article of the Convention begins with the words “the forms must be obeyed”....

...ignorance of international law even among folks who should know better. International relations theorists who didn’t recognize a distinction between their criticisms of particular international institutions and the substance of international law. Law professors who had never contemplated any difference between comparative law and international law. A leading political scientist who, on hearing that I taught both constitutional law and international law, expressed amazement at teaching in such “opposite” fields – the one being hard core LAW-law, the other being (something like) a Hogwarts text on witchcraft and wizardry. And...

principle of international law called pacta sunt servanda that is generally accepted and, in any case, assumed. On the basis of this principle, valid treaties give rise to binding legal obligations. Similar rationales apply to customary international law and general principles of law. States and legal operators must apply them. Material sources, by contrast, supply the substance of law without themselves creating formal obligations, and therefore need not be followed. Most law textbooks refer to material sources as social, economic, political, moral, historical, and cultural influences shaping the law. They...

to future lawyers in the Commonwealth Caribbean. As such, our mission and focus is distinctively regional, including the integrated study of the law from across the Caribbean. New colleagues are expected to adapt their teaching accordingly. While we are open to receiving applications from strong academics across all subject areas, those of notable interest in this hiring round include: Tax Law; Maritime Law; Climate Change, Renewable Energies, or the Blue Economy and the Law; Law and Development with emphasis on Small Islands; Health Law; Banking Law; Corporate Finance and Corporate...

[Dr Talita de Souza Dias is the Shaw Foundation Junior Research Fellow in Law at Jesus College, University of Oxford.] 1. Introduction In this post, I discuss the findings of a short statistical survey into the gender and nationality/regional representation of authors published by two mainstream academic publishers in their main international law monograph series: Oxford University Press (OUP) and Cambridge University Press (CUP). These are OUP’s 1) Oxford Monographs in International Humanitarian & Criminal Law and 2) Oxford Monographs in International Law, as well as 3) CUP’s Cambridge Studies...

War was an internal armed conflict. Thus, all such developments were, at best, domestic common law only. They were one state’s practice rather than customary international law. Such domestic common law doctrines and developments are fairly within the subject matter jurisdiction of military commissions from the perspective of U.S. law. However, their application to extraterritorial violations by non-nationals would implicate the legality principle and the constitutional prohibition of ex post facto laws, but only if not consistent with relevant international law. For me, then, the key question is whether the...

for justice in courts abroad. More welcoming to their pleas have been common law jurisdictions. However, what surprised was the dearth of legal precedents holding parent companies liable for subsidiary misconduct. Under common law, a duty of care (DoC) has to be found in precedents or be created by meeting the Caparo criteria. Furthermore, the corporate veil principle in corporate law and the tort law principle of non-liability for a third-party misconduct loomed large. As courts have had a ready-made legislative basis in tort-negligence law on which to hold MNEs...

the search for the general practice of states and opinio juris takes into account the variety of forms of states. In the considered wisdom of all the states including the United States in acceding to the Statute of the ICJ we recognize customary international law as law to be applied. Clearly in that bargain states consider that such law has some value to them. You take a far to United States centric view of international law. What about customary international law as a public good that all states are providing...

...the statute in accord with international law. In addition, reasonable respect for international comity has long been treated as within the discretion of US courts, and appropriate exhaustion could also be seen as a matter of comity. Jordan Doug: Charming Betsy can (and should) only be used to support extraterritoriality because, as you note, the ATS must be interpreted consistently with customary international law and it is customary international law that permits the U.S. to exercise universal jurisdiction over violations of customary international law. International "comity" (as a former Chief...

The following is a guest-post — actually a short book-proposal — by my friend Mark Osiel, the Aliber Family Chair in Law at the University of Iowa. I have agreed to post it despite the inordinate jealousy I feel toward his remarkable productivity. Mark would greatly appreciate comments and criticisms, especially examples and counter-examples of what he is trying to get at. Rethinking the Law of War Crimes: “Collateral Damage”and “Distinction” Current law on war crimes is deeply disappointing to most people – public and legal professional — who pay...