Search: Symposium on the Functional Approach to the Law of Occupation

[José Manuel Barreto works on decolonizing human rights and international law based on TWAIL and Decolonial Theory. He teaches law at the Javeriana University in Bogotá and will publish ‘Decolonial Theory and the History of Human Rights’ in 2025.] The Palestinian genocide has unveiled the deep colonial structure of the international legal order. The so-called Westphalian system has been inveterately depicted and legally defined in the UN Charter as one of ‘equal’ ‘sovereign’ ‘states.’ Against the black letter of positive international law, the Palestinian Genocide has made evident the material...

those who violate the laws of war “cannot obtain immunity”; individuals are criminally responsible if they comply with orders which are “in violation of the International Law of war”. These statements convey the message that all individuals in the world (not only leaders) have an international duty not to commit the crimes proscribed by the IMT Charter, i.e. aggression, war crimes and crimes against humanity. Note that these three statements appear in a section of the judgment entitled “The Law of the Charter”, a section which essentially consists of considerations...

of submission may be nominated for this prize. Works that have already been considered for this prize may not be re-submitted. Entries may address topics such as the use of force in international law, the conduct of hostilities during international and non‑international armed conflicts, protected persons and objects under the law of armed conflict, the law of weapons, operational law, rules of engagement, occupation law, peace operations, counter‑terrorist operations, and humanitarian assistance. Other topics bearing on the application of international law during armed conflict or other military operations are also...

applied concurrently with greater precision; and that international lawyers should consider whether the values that underwrite a “humanized” IHL and international human rights law alike should ever countenance limited exceptions to the axiom (e.g., in cases of humanitarian intervention or “transformative occupation”). Above all, my hope is that the article, for all its flaws, will help to revive a dialogue about the appropriate relationship between the traditional branches of the law of war in the twenty-first century—for these issues have been conspicuously (and, I think, dangerously) absent from that dialogue....

in regard to their international legal commitments. Applicable International Law Under international refugee and human rights law, specifically the 1951 Refugee Convention and its 1967 Protocol, States have an obligation to uphold the principle of non-refoulement. This principle prevents States from expelling or returning any refugee in “any manner whatsoever to the frontiers or territories where his [or her] life or freedom would be threatened.” Any person who qualifies as a refugee under the 1951 Convention is entitled to the right to non-refoulement. According to the Convention, a refugee is...

...in our conclusion, to consider what the Venezuelan situation means for democratic legitimacy as a criterion for the recognition of governments in international law. Democratic Legitimacy and Recognition In the past 25 years, there has been increased interest in the role of democratic legitimacy in the practice of recognition of governments and in particular whether, in addition to effectiveness, democratic legitimacy constitutes a distinct criterion for the legal recognition of governments. Cases like Haiti (1994) or Sierra Leone (1998) generated much controversy as a result of the fact that the...

...the chief judge went today to explain why Saddam was sentenced to death was to say Saddam he found guilty of Article 12 A, through Article 15 B, of the Iraqi High Criminal Court Law… All that means, examining at the law, is that Saddam was guilty of “willful murder” because he had “ordered, solicited or induced the commission of such a crime, which in fact occurs or is attempted.” Saddam Hussein was found guilty of ordering murders. Who he murdered, how, when and what proved his guilt, we are...

Thanks to the editors of Yale Journal of International Law and the hosts of Opinio Juris for the opportunity to comment on Rob Sloane’s terrific article, The Cost of Conflation: Preserving the Dualism of Jus ad Bellum and the Jus in Bello in the Contemporary Law of War. The piece is, in my view, essential reading for law of war scholars. I find myself in broad agreement with much of Sloane’s analysis so in my necessarily brief comments I offer a series of questions aimed at clarifying or strengthening his...

Philippines to use this signal. China is confronted with a situation that reminds me of the US with regard to Nicaragua at the ICJ or even the Medellin space. How in conformity with rule of law will China act - and what does rule of law mean in this setting. Best, Ben Kristen Boon Annex VII to the Convention provides some points of reference with regards to: (i) selection of arbitrators (Para. 3), and (ii) what happens if China fails to defend its case (Para. 9). Of particular note is...

...it is for the court to decide if the underlying Law of Nations being defined actually exists. Congress used a term "Conspiracy" and some language that is very similar to the domestic criminal definition. We are all agreed that that type of Conspiracy does not exist in international law. So the CMCR then enumerates dozens of prior cases where Military Commissions and International Tribunals have tried something they also called "Conspiracy" (though defined differently), and some things that are similar to conspiracy, or are "membership" offenses, to suggest that there...

actions of some actors are given more weight due to factors that are completely arbitrary and unrelated to international law, such as linguistic limitations and/or access to documentation. This is something that has been already noted in the past, particularly with the use of force regime, and it’s a problem that is receiving increasing attention since the past year. Hopefully, as international law outlets become more diversified both culturally and geographically, this will slowly begin to change. In this regard, I am happy to see OJ itself taking the lead!...

[Charlotte Peevers is a Lecturer in Law at the University of Technology, Sydney and author of ‘The Politics of Justifying Force: the Suez Crisis, the Iraq War, and International Law‘ (Oxford University Press: 2013). Part one of this guest post can be found here.] Legal-Political Authority and International Law Any review of the inquiry hearings would be incomplete without a word from Tony Blair. In this extract from his so-called ‘recall’ to the inquiry on 21 January 2011 Sir Roderick Lyne asks him about his statement to the House of...