Search: Symposium on the Functional Approach to the Law of Occupation

Homework, people, homework: Bangladesh may request the International Criminal Court to put on trial Pakistani forces for alleged war crimes, a top official said Tuesday. ‘We will take the matter to the International Criminal Court and seek the trial of the members of the Pakistani occupation forces who committed crimes against humanity during our liberation war,’ State Minister for Liberation War Affairs, AB Tajul Islam, told German Press Agency dpa. The alleged perpetrators of the atrocities among the Pakistani forces were not in Bangladesh now, so Dhaka needed international assistance...

...endorsed by the D.C. federal appeals court, tolerated by Congress, and by its terms untouched by this order – is that the statutory Authorization for Use of Military Force passed in 2001 includes authority for the President to detain certain individuals (a category defined with modest and fuzzy reference to international law) for the duration of an armed conflict (within the meaning of international law) between the United States and Al Qaeda. Not an implausible basis of authority in principle. But in reality, the AUMF is vague, and international law...

[Valerie Oosterveld is a Professor at the University of Western Ontario (Western University) Faculty of Law in Canada and a faculty member with her university’s Institute for Earth and Space Exploration, also known as Western Space. Anne Campbell is a recent graduate of Western University and a current Western Space summer intern.] Plans for the extraction of water and minerals in outer space – particularly on the Moon – are developing faster than international law is evolving to address this reality. As a result, the Legal Subcommittee of the United...

...properly described as skeptical of yielding "sovereignty to an unruly and unpredictable global community"? Do you disagree that there are those who are committed in the abstract to the idea of international law, but functionally ignorant of the doctrinal details and substantive law? Or do you think everyone who subscribes to progressive orthodoxy is ipso facto "well educated" and a serious scholar of international law? Do you? Do you disagree that "progressive" intlawyers can be guilty of self-aggrandizement when they equate their opinions with that of "the international community"? International...

...Wyngaert from the Uhuru Kenyatta trial. Foreign Policy highlights a document uncovering the US’ plans to carry out cyber attacks since the Clinton years. The last of the South Korean workers at the joint industrial complex will withdrawal in the face of North Korea’s escalating nuclear threats. Rebel fighters from Darfur have stormed the Sudanese city of Um Rawaba and have vowed to take Khartoum. In a sign of rising patriotism, Japan celebrated its first “Restoration of Sovereignty” Day on Sunday, to celebrate the end of allied occupation after WWII....

type of warfare and have the characters playing the same role as the audience – they are watching events unfold on screen. In this regard, they are more immersive as a viewing experience and present a new form of law, ethics and proportionality to viewers. These films do reinforce existing narratives in international law, however they place the viewer in the position of decision makers. The films complement each other well but adopt different approaches when presenting a similar ethical conundrum of the collateral cost of action. Introducing Good Kill...

[ Yilin Wang is a PhD candidate in International Law at the Graduate Institute and a research assistant of the China, Law and Development Project at the University of Oxford.] On 16 September 2021, Armenia instituted proceedings against Azerbaijan before the ICJ on the grounds of racial discrimination, hatred and ethnic cleansing against individuals of Armenian ethnic or national origin in light of the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (CERD). A week later, Azerbaijan raised a counterclaim against Armenia before the Court for its...

...a tribunal could not be grounded in the domestic criminal jurisdiction of other states simply because there is no universal jurisdiction for the crime of aggression. So I agree with you that, as a matter of law and policy, it is best to leave it for Ukraine to prosecute the crime of aggression committed by Putin and other senior Russian leaders perhaps by using the definition of the crime under customary international law - which was undoubtedly binding and accessible to those individuals at the time of the offence. 2....

Patrick S. O'Donnell Or, as mom and dad incessantly told us: two wrongs don't make a right. NomdeDroit Of course, all of this analysis would be meaningless in the actual situation described - i.e. humanity facing annihilation. The laws of nature and survival would take over. No one would let his civilization be wiped out because of a fear of international law. Just as the Constitution is not a suicide pact, neither is international law. Remember, international law could only be enforced by the victor (or a third party) against...

[Nicolás Carrillo-Santarelli is a Colombian lawyer, PhD on international law and international relations. He works as a researcher and lecturer of Public International Law at the La Sabana University, Colombia. This is Part I of a two-part post.] Introduction In terms of international law, the region of the Americas is going through what the so-called ‘Chinese curse’ would label as interesting times -as can be seen, for instance, with the recognition of Juan Guaidó as the rightful interim president of Venezuela by some states in the region, followed by support...

still room to outlaw more effectively the means and methods of warfare that have proven so destructive of human lives. Blockade, siege, aerial bombardment and nuclear weapons have killed and continue to kill thousands of people. As individuals committed to this field of law we should not be too complacent about the state of law, but struggle to eliminate the idea that these are appropriate methods of warfare in the modern world. Some philosophers like Frowe would ask us to go further, pointing out: ‘There is no number of casualties...

...Defense Secretary Rumsfeld’s preference for keeping forces light, insisting that it was possible to minimize the amount of supplies and surrounding support required to overthrow the regime. Of all the lessons out of the 2003 invasion and the years that followed, it seemed to me the failure of that attack-now-plan-later approach was among the clearest. The latest U.S. engagement in Iraq and Syria is of course in key respects different. U.S. troops are there, we have maintained, to support the Iraqis in their efforts against ISIL. Our commitment of ground...