Search: jens iverson

bmaz Response...Where is Part Deaux?? bmaz Also, the math questions on this site are too hard, I cannot comment anymore! Jens David Ohlin Again, very interesting! Do you ever sleep? This analysis suggests that, absent specific statutory authority, the CIA should not be involved in paramilitary activities (because they do not relate to intelligence gathering or analysis). Kevin Jon Heller Jens, I'm not sure that I'm claiming the CIA can never lawfully be involved in paramilitary activities without Congressional approval. I'm just trying to figure out where the authority to...

Francisco Forrest Martin I hope that Professor Cohen will address the natural law of nations, its express recognition in treaties (e.g, Treaty of Ghent, Treaty of Paris, Hague Convention, Geneva Convention Prot. 1), and its relationship to international tribunal competence to decide cases ex aequo et bono. Francisco Forrest Martin Jens David Ohlin My sense is that this is really a general anxiety about the customary international law of criminal norms generally. International criminal lawyers always talk about customary international law, and it is a bit unclear what they mean,...

Kate Cronin-Furman Oh, interesting point about Eichmann. Even if that argument worked, though, it would only apply to events (now) on the territory of South Sudan. So I remain puzzled about the investigation regarding Kordofan, Nuba Mountains, and Blue Nile. It seems like they would have to be anticipating a Security Council referral, right? Jens David Ohlin I think the Eichmann argument is particularly strong with regard to allegations of genocide. Although Eichmann is often read as a universal jurisdiction case, for me it is really a passive personality jurisdiction...

...Summit documents: Growth and responsibility in the world economy (38 pages, PDF) vargold German high court upholds police ban on G8 summit protest Anti-G8 demonstration violence in Rostock: questions and contradictions vargold The Dilemma of G8 Protest (June 6, 2007) Although the mobilization of activists at the 2007 Heiligendamm G8 summit gave "unprecedented" media exposure to the social justice movement, it had the unfortunate side effect of lending attention and legitimacy to the group of eight major industrial nations. Jens Martens of Global Policy Forum argues that, in making such...

Jens David Ohlin Going back to our previous discussion regarding complementarity, if there is really such little control over the Zintan rebels by the NTC, then there's an interesting argument that the Libyan government is not able to prosecute Saif because they do not have custody of him. Kevin Jon Heller Jens, I completely agree. But what is ironic is that the OTP is unlikely to raise the argument with the PTC, because it supports -- or at least did under LMO -- Libya's admissibility challenge. It will be up...

...and violate human rights law. Under the ECHR, it is hard to see how derogating from Article 2 would be strictly required by the exigencies of the situation, which you describe as stable prior to the government attack. Under the ICCPR, ACHR, and ACHPR the initial attack seems like an arbitrary deprivation of life. On a related note, I would recommend Eliav Lieblich, Internal Jus Ad Bellum https://ssrn.com/abstract=2663954 Very best, Adil Jens David Ohlin Adil, can you clarify this sentence?: "But when the LOAC fails to prohibit arbitrary deprivations of...

...him only with using child soldiers. So no, I don't think there has to be a correlation between conduct and crimes; I think there has to be a correlation between sentences. If the national sentence is long enough, nothing in the principle of complementarity suggests that the ICC should still intervene. Jens David Ohlin Kevin, excellent article--an important intervention in an issue of increasing importance. I wonder if your use of the phrase "radical complementarity" is counter-productive to your argument. If anything, I would think that you would want to...

...at the heart of the relationship between Articles 27(2) of the Rome Statute, which provides that Heads of State immunity shall not bar the Court’s jurisdiction, and 98(1), according immunity to senior officials of non-State Parties. Iverson argues that: “Article 98 was crafted not to interfere with States qua States and with the efficient performance of the functions of diplomatic missions, while retaining the capacity to hold heads of state to account”. However, in the Arrest Warrant Case, the ICJ held that absolute immunity from criminal prosecution in foreign domestic...

...final project conference on ‘Jus Post Bellumand the Justice of Peace’ on 29-30 September 2016 in The Hague. Submissions should include an abstract of no more than 300 words and be accompanied by a CV. Submissions must be written in English and sent to j.m.iverson@law.leidenuniv.nl no later than 5 August 2016. Draft papers should be submitted by 15 September 2016. Announcements TDM 2 (2016) Latin America Special (Vol. 1): Prepared by guest editors Dr. Ignacio Torterola and Quinn Smith, this special addresses the various challenges and changes at work in...

Right now we are locked in a complex dispute over the claims in the SSCI Torture Report that the CIA’s torture program was ineffective (as well as illegal). Part of the dispute can be frustrating because I think we are conflating a number of more distinct questions when we ask whether the torture was effective or not. Consider the following article from John Yoo who says that the torture report should be confined to the “dustbin” of history because it is inaccurate. He claims that torturing the detainees...

I agree with Jens’ excellent post on the importance of the “unwilling or unable” standard to the US justification for legal strikes on non-state actors in Syria. I agree this action may reveal state practice supporting (or rejecting) this legal justification. I am curious whether the UK, France, or other states that may be participating in Syria strikes will embrace this theory. (I already know the Russians have roundly rejected this US justification). I also wonder whether this legal justification will weaken, as a policy matter, the ability of the...

...here. In his comments, Thomas Weigend agreed with James’ diagnosis of the contradictions in the law of complicity in international criminal law, but disagreed with the proposal to do away with the different modes of liability and shift the emphasis instead to the sentencing stage. James’ response can be found here. Finally, Jens Ohlin strongly disagreed with the unitary theory and defended the importance of the distinction between principals and accessories. James’ response can be found here. For those of you who want to continue the discussion, the Leiden Journal...