Search: Syria Insta-Symposium

I am looking forward to the contributions to our “insta-symposium” on Ukraine and international law. I don’t have a tremendous amount to add at this point, except to point out that President Obama has been aggressive about accusing Russia of violating international law and about the importance of international law generally. This has gone beyond merely charging Russia with violation of the prohibitions on aggression and the use of force contained in the U.N. Charter. In his statement today, he took aim at the proposed referendum in Crimea on joining...

...already messy area of law incoherent in light of the Court’s own most recent precedent, as I noted in an OJ Insta-Symposium contribution last spring. What I’d like to explore now is another question raised by this terrific series of posts: the extent to which state law incorporating international law may authorize suits for causes of action arising abroad after Kiobel. This question is both especially urgent because it involves a potential alternative avenue for litigating human rights abuses abroad in U.S. courts, and especially vexing because it juxtaposes different...

This week on Opinio Juris, we continued to follow the situation in Ukraine as it unfolded with an insta-symposium. Alexander Cooley gave an overview of the power politics at play, while Chris posted about Russia’s use of legal rhetoric as a politico-military strategy, and about how language affects the evolution of international law. This last post built on a discussion between Julian and Peter in which Julian argued that the crisis shows the limits of international law, while Peter took aim at the Perfect Compliance Fallacy. Further issues of compliance...

...may further the informed discussion of this crisis. The Ukraine-Russia Crisis of 2022: Marc Weller, “Is Russia’s Bullying Illegal” (8 February 2022); Sophia Zademack & Luke James, “Western Weapons in Ukraine” (8 February 2022); Jennifer Trahan, “A Reminder of the Importance of the Crime of Aggression: Considering the Situation of Russia and Ukraine” (4 February 2022); David Scheffer, “Legal Principles Matter in Defense of Democracies” (17 January 2022). We also invite readers to explore any of our previous posts on Ukraine and Russia, including our Insta-Symposium on Ukraine from 2014....

...the Russian Federation. For more on the Ukraine crisis, see our insta-symposium here. Russia has made what may be a move towards taking part in talks over the Ukraine crisis, but is standing firm in its insistence that Crimea has a right to break away from Kiev’s rule. Germany’s Angela Merkel delivered a rebuke to President Vladimir Putin, telling him that a planned Moscow-backed referendum on whether Crimea should join Russia was illegal and violated Ukraine’s constitution. The EU has reiterated its earlier pledge to ink a trade deal with...

from the military hospital in which he was staying. The US is dispatching army planners to Jordan but is wary of direct American intervention in Syria. Human Rights Watch has urged Libya to allow access for Al-Senussi, char For readers who follow the US’ current conflict with al-Qaeda and affiliated forces closely, you may recall two guest posts (here and here) about a recent symposium entitled The Boundaries of the Battlefield. The organizers of that symposium (full-disclosure: I was one of them) have written a summary report on the symposium....

[Professor James Gathii, provides this timely insta-background on today’s decision by the the ICC prosecutor to open an investigation into the 2007 post-election violence in Kenya. Professor Gaathi teaches at Albany Law School, where he is the Associate Dean for Research and Scholarship and Governor George E. Pataki Professor of International Commercial Law. He publishes extensively on legal developments in sub-Saharan Africa.] The International Criminal Court’s Chief Prosecutor Luis Moreno-Ocampo on November 5, 2009 informed Kenyan President Mwai Kibaki and Prime Minister Raila Odinga that he had decided to request...

This week on Opinio Juris, it was hard to miss our insta-symposium on the Supreme Court’s decision in Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum. Ken beat Julian to the punch to break the news and link to the opinions. The core part of Chief Justice Roberts’ opinion for the Court, on the insufficiency of “mere corporate presence” to displace the presumption against extraterritoriality, can be found in this post by Julian. Roger read this to require that the ATS can only apply to conduct that at least partly takes place within...

We had a busy week on the blog, so if you haven’t been able to keep track of it all, here is a summary of what happened. We continued the Ukraine Insta-symposium with posts by Remy Jorritsma on the application of IHL to the conflict between Russia and Ukraine and by Sina Etezazian on Russia’s right to protect its citizens in the Crimea and Ukraine’s right to use of force in self-defence. A post by Greg Fox and one by Tali Kolesov Har-Oz and Ori Pomson discussed the limits of...

...do seem to be trending toward applying it strictly (i.e., booting out cases). I don’t know if I think that will continue in the lower courts, however. In the splendid Insta-Symposium here at OJ on Kiobel, commentators raised various ways, several of them ingenious, in which a district court judge could march ahead with ATS suits. Whether Roberts or Breyer’s approach to the question of jurisdiction, in other words, each still suffers from Sosa’s “Delphic oracle” problem: a judge wanting to find grounds to kick out the case could do...

refugees are adequately protected. Harold Koh closed off the symposium with his reflections on Sale’s legacy. Also continuing from last week was our Ukraine Insta-Symposium. Boris Mamlyuk argued for a better empirical understanding of the facts on the ground to assess the legality of intervention in Ukraine. As the events in Crimea unfolded, questions of recognition and annexation came into the spotlight with a post by Anna Dolidze on the non-recognition of Crimea, one by Chris analyzing the legality of recognition of a secessionist entity, and one by Greg Fox...

Anthony Colangelo Bill, I'm naturally with you that the presumption does not or should not apply to jurisdictional statutes https://opiniojuris.org/2013/05/10/kiobel-insta-symposium-kiobel-contradicts-morrison/. But what are we to make of Kiobel's interrogation of the ATS proper to determine the cause of action question, e.g., “to rebut the presumption, the ATS would need to evince a clear indication of extraterritoriality” and that "nothing in the statute rebuts that presumption." That looks a lot like applying the presumption to a jurisdictional statute. Am I correct to assume that you would say the ATS is somehow...