Search: Symposium on the Functional Approach to the Law of Occupation

Readers of this blog know that the top legal adviser at the U.S. State Department, John Bellinger, is not afraid to take on critics of the U.S. government’s treatment of international law. He did so on this blog a few months ago. Yesterday, he went into the “capital” of international law, the Hague, to defend the U.S. administration’s approach to international law from its many critics. It’s a bit long, but well worth a full-read. Here is his roadmap: . . .I will demonstrate that our approach to international law...

Al kerrami Is this (Justice Symposium) gonna to say the truth about France, the KSA, Egypt, Russia, the UAE ...etc? Those countries who are making Libya as you said in your article. If you’re not going to tell the truth to the world and will end you (Justice Symposium) without any real solutions, please don’t do it; because talking is not enough for Libyans. Walid You forgot to mention Qatar and Turkey!...

...The Hat-Tip to Maxie B. actually says it all. Ori Maon, I would actually suggest reading the judgment one of the biased sources regards. In that case, the HCJ thoroughly discussed the issue and found a balance between the relevant competing interests (on the assumption that the law of belligerent occupation applies). Regarding Yitzchak Shapira, I'm afraid the point ignores one of the basic principles of international law: "a State is responsible only for its own conduct, that is to say the conduct of persons acting, on whatever basis, on...

this comes with its increasing frustration with the grabs for power of the Executive in this war. The persnickety analysis of lawyers who do not appreciate the grandeur of the law and the rule of law I suspect is part of the frustration. The willingness of the majority to step away from the incomplete 1789 habeas records, to look at what happened in other places post 1789, and to synthesize from these principles the way it is going to operate now is hugely significant. I was very much struck by...

own book on combatants. Are there international guidelines in defining combatants in irregular wars? If so can they be brought into this or another such discussion? Eugene Kontorovich Patrick makes some good points. But still, international lawyers should take an "international" approach, otherwise they are practicing "EU + law" rather than international law. And their interests should be informed by where the action is at, not where the political interest is at, especially if the preservation of human life is the goal of IHT. The fact that geopolitical interest differs...

[Sari Bashi is Executive Director at Gisha – Legal Center for Freedom of Movement.] This is the second response in our Symposium on the Functional Approach to the Law of Occupation. Earlier posts can be found in the Related Links at the end of this post. It has been a pleasure to read all the contributions and Kevin’s thoughtful introduction. I want to respond to Valentina Azarov‘s and Pnina Sharvit Baruch‘s posts, which in some ways are mirror images of each other. I enjoyed them both but respectfully express reservations...

the United Nations. A core component of this approach is a commitment to putting the rights and dignity of victims of UN sexual exploitation and abuse (SEA) at the forefront of the UN’s response, including through the appointment of a Victim Rights’ Advocate (VRA) who will ensure access to “appropriate and timely judicial processes” and that the “full effect of local laws, including remedies for victims, are brought to bear” in SEA cases. Both prior and since the launch of this new approach, the Institute for Justice & Democracy in...

was to prevent such an imminent risk of irreparable damage, impacting on the 32 individuals’ right to life and on their physical and psychological integrity, by demanding that Malta immediately fulfil its international obligations to coordinate or conduct search and rescue operations in its SAR zone. The Interim Measure Decision: Applying the Functional Approach to Jurisdiction For the first time under the interim measures system of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and its Optional Protocol, the UN Human Rights Committee recognised Malta’s jurisdiction by applying the functional...

this as the Phantom Menace. Jurisdictional anomalies crept in Cuba, Afghanistan, and Iraq for over a decade.  Third, military occupations and their intrinsic controversies continue. The Rule of Law in Armed Conflicts (RULAC) database charts multiple occupations worldwide. International Humanitarian Law applies to territories under occupation, a question raised when Russia invaded Ukraine in 2022. But legal expectations face the reality of military strength.  This past July, the International Court of Justice ruled against Israel, regarding its occupation of Palestinian Territory. The international community worries about the political justifications given...

[Lazola Nomkala holds Bachelor of Commerce and Bachelor of Laws degrees from the University of the Western Cape (UWC)] On 19 July 2024, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) ruled that the Israeli occupation in Palestine was illegal. Despite the disputed nature of Israel’s origins, the occupation formally began in 1967. What followed was the violent dispossession of Palestinians achieved via the confiscation of their homelands. The occupation has devastated entire Palestinian communities as Israel has imposed draconian restrictions on their movement, as well as limited their access to their...

[Pranay Lekhi is a Legal Advisor – Not Admitted UK – at Allen & Overy, London. He graduated first-class from the University of Cambridge with a specialization in International Law. Views are strictly personal.] On October 7 2020, the Supreme Court of India held that public places cannot be occupied indefinitely while exercising the right to peacefully protest (para 17). The judgement has faced criticismon the basis that it disregards the relevant principles of international law. However, in this post it will be argued that international law provides articulate limitations...

to examine states’ obligations to bring about an end to serious breaches of international law. Peremptory Norms in International Law and Obligations erga omnes In the OPT case, the court stated that, “in cases of foreign occupation such as the present case, the right to self-determination constitutes a peremptory norm of international law,” (para. 233). This is the only time that peremptory norms are mentioned in the entire opinion even though, as noted by Judge Tladi in his separate opinion, “other norms that undoubtedly qualify as jus cogens are not...