Search: Symposium on the Functional Approach to the Law of Occupation

[David Sloss is the Professor of Law and Director of the Center for Global Law and Policy at Santa Clara Law School] In Samantar v. Yousuf (2010), the Supreme Court directed lower courts to apply common law rules to resolve immunity defenses raised by individual foreign government officers, except in cases where a treaty provides the controlling rule. The Court remanded Samantar to the lower court to decide, in the first instance, the proper content of the common law rule. The Fourth Circuit heard oral argument on this issue last...

international law in any case. The assassination ban does not include lawful acts of self-defense. Consider again the Koh speech on this topic. It too emphasizes that the ban is to be understood as not including lawful self-defense: [U]nder domestic law, the use of lawful weapons systems—consistent with the applicable laws of war—for precision targeting of specific high-level belligerent leaders when acting in self-defense or during an armed conflict is not unlawful, and hence does not constitute “assassination.” (Emphasis added.) This is one of several places in which the Koh...

...and only in a state of war could civilians/non-combatants be intentionally targeted. Chris "Volokh largely ignores Campos' argument that Reynolds is openly and enthusiastically endorsing assassinations that are illegal under U.S. and international law." Isn't it most sensible to construe Reynolds as implicitly advocating a change in the law? Kevin Heller Chris, No. I think a law professor is capable of advocating a change in policy instead of murder. Chris "I think a law professor is capable of advocating a change in policy instead of murder." But I don't understand...

brief were mentioned by name in the oral argument. The Goldsmith brief was not primarily about extraterritoriality – it was much more about whether this was international law as such, or instead some kind of well-intentioned but nonetheless faux-international law committed to the hands of US courts. (I have sometimes referred to it here at Opinio Juris as the “law of the hegemon” which US district courts have been persuaded by ATS plaintiffs’ lawyers, mistakenly in my view, to regard as “international law.”) This then combines with a general worry...

There is a friendly debate going on at Prawfsblawg about whether people who have PhDs or JSDs in law are entitled to refer to themselves as “Dr. so-and-so.” Skepticism seems to be the order of the day; here are quotes from Paul Horwitz and Jeff Yates, respectively: Although I think there’s a good deal to be said for obtaining JSDs or Ph.D’s in law, we might think about whether that trend represents a similar claim to authority and respect for law as an academic discipline; and if those folks start...

composed of international treaties, international customs, and general principles of law and judicial decisions can only be utilized as a subsidiary means for the determination of rules of law rather than as an actual source of law. However, the U.S. may again make use of the gap between the understanding shared by small group of legal experts and the general public’s misunderstanding of international law so as to label China’s non-recognition of the award as non-compliance with international law. In fact, neither the U.S. nor the Philippines has much credibility...

[Zinaida Miller is Professor of Law & International Affairs at Northeastern University.] In his wide-ranging exploration, Gerry Simpson demonstrates the fundamental tensions experienced within international law and by international lawyers as they simultaneously embrace and distance themselves from the individuals, sites, histories, modes of violence, and narratives at the center of their work. To approach international law through the sentimental, Simpson suggests, allows him to understand it not only through the lenses of literature, emotion, and sensibility but as a “life lived” by people with professional and personal preoccupations and...

[Elizabeth Stubbins Bates is a PhD candidate in Law at SOAS, University of London.] States must disseminate international humanitarian law (IHL) as widely as possible, and integrate it into programmes of military instruction. These obligations exist in international and non-international armed conflict (with differences between treaty and customary international law for the latter) and are among the few IHL duties on states in peace-time. International humanitarian law typically applies only during armed conflict or belligerent occupation. This post tackles the assumption that simply disseminating or teaching IHL is sufficient to...

They have also analyzed the production of international treaties by transnational elites and their localization and translation on the ground. Given the critical need to uncover how international law is produced and operates in practice, legal scholars can gain insights from anthropological literature and adopt ethnographic tools in their own analysis. As I will outline below, anthropology offers unique insights in understanding international law behavior. What is an Anthropological Approach to International Law Anthropological theory and methods enables the study of how international law operates in practice, from how it...

are moving from being the outcome of the rule of law to the condition of the possibility of the rule of law. Drawing on the Georgian protests and the subsequent opinions of the Venice Commission, I argue that this shift offers liberal constitutionalism one of the answers to the challenge of autocratic legalism. No to the Russian Law In February 2023 the Georgian Parliament passed the “Transparency of Foreign Influence” bill, which used the label “agent of foreign influence” for any NGO, media outlet, or similar entity that receives at least 20...

drugs, pay your taxes on them.” No one, I think, would argue that crack taxes are valid only if the state is willing to decriminalise the sale of narcotics. But that is what Murray’s argument requires, if we apply it to domestic law — and I see no reason why why international and domestic law should differ in terms of the “regulation requires authorisation” rule. Even if there is a reason to treat international law and domestic law differently in terms of Murray’s rule, IHL itself both prohibits and regulates...

a “law”?; and 2) what is the best way to enforce that law? Under Hart’s approach, the assumption is that all laws must be enforced in some way because the very nature of “law” is that it must be enforced. Unfortunately numerous courts and commentators have twisted Holmes’ idea to produce the opposite result. They think that courts should simply bypass step one, proceed directly to step two, and ask whether the relevant law explicitly requires judicial enforcement. Under this approach, if the law does not explicitly require judicial enforcement,...