Levit put it, “International
law is not always a matter of deliberate, reflective choice.” Levit recommended shifting the gaze of international
law away from high-level diplomacy in order to take account of the unofficial practices and behaviors of epistemic communities that affect the
lawmaking process. While Levit recognized the democratic legitimacy challenges presented by this “bottom up”
approach and admitted that this is not necessarily the preferable or desirable
approach, she emphasized the
approach’s value in revealing the mythological quality of many traditional international
law stories. She also saw value...