for purposes of the geographic scope of human rights treaties, in other words, refers to the state’s exercise of authority, whether
lawful or un
lawful, not whether the state could have
lawfully acted or legislated consistent with international
law rules of jurisdiction. (Indeed, it is precisely un
lawful conduct that human rights
law may be most interested in controlling). Marko is to be applauded for lending needed clarity to this oft-misunderstood area of
law. The second potentially transformative contribution is Marko’s third, “respect/ensure” model for analyzing when a state’s activities trigger jurisdiction...