This week on
Opinio Juris,
Chris Borgen drew our attention to a
NY Times op-ed explaining the surprising reason why in the grand bargain dividing the top posts at the World Bank and the IMF between the US and Europe, the US ended up with the World Bank rather than the IMF.
Kevin Heller posted the abstract of his response in a mini-symposium of the Texas International Law Journal on
Karl Chang’s article arguing that the law of neutrality provides the legal framework for the US conflict with Al-Qaeda. He also referred us to Lawfare for a discussion of the
Al-Nashiri prosecution. In a throwback to the Cold War, he also quizzed us on a
quote about Cuba following the controversy surrounding Miami Marlin’s manager Ozzie Guillen, and
posted about Congressman West’s allegations about Democrats being members of the Communist Party. He also critiqued ICC Prosecutor Moreno-Ocampo for
undermining the OTP's credibility in Côte d'Ivoire.
Peter Spiro wondered about the cautionary lessons for legal academics of “
postparadigmism” in International Relations and
discussed a European Court of Human Rights decision denying Greek non-resident citizens the right to vote in the Greek parliamentary elections from their foreign place of residence.
Ken Anderson posted about a
speech by the CIA’s General Counsel at Harvard Law School. In
her post on this speech, Deborah Pearlstein discussed the authority for the CIA’s use of force under US constitutional law and the restraints on this use of force under international law.