This week on
Opinio Juris, we teamed up with the American Journal of International Law to bring you a discussion on the two lead articles in their latest issue. Jose Alvarez, the co-editor in chief of the AJIL,
explained their decision to run this online symposium, and discussed what ties both articles together, despite their differences.
First up was Leila Sadat's article,
Crimes Against Humanity in the Modern Age, summarized
here. In his comment, Darryl Robinson
traced the history of academic discourse on the policy element and highlighted the most recent decision in Gbagbo. Elies van Sliedregt argued in favour of the
humaneness side of humanity to give the concept of crimes against humanity a modern meaning. Leila's response is
here.
Eyal Benvenisti then
introduced his article,
Sovereigns as Trustees of Humanity, in which he tests the limits of the traditional concept of state sovereignty in light of the intensifying interdependence between states.