In association with the International Commission of Jurists

Search: Affective Justice: Book Symposium: A Response

27 Feb

Our thanks to everyone who has participated in this symposium—John Bellinger, David Sloss, Chimene Keitner, and Steve Vladeck—as well as to Matt Christiansen, who has coordinated the symposium for YJIL. It’s been such a pleasure to see the thoughtful and varied reactions to our Article. Here we take the opportunity to offer a few brief words in response to round out the symposium. First, we very much appreciate John Bellinger’s generous and kind response. We know that John labored long and hard to bring the Medellin case to a different...
27.02.12 | |

21 Feb

...his "tattered, 20-year old ID card" (the ostensible reason: living for a time abroad caused him to forfeit his status as permanent resident of Israel). When pressed about the ruling against Awad, Prime Minister Yitzhak Shamir referred reporters "to the security services." This by way of a reminder that we hardly have sufficient or even presumptive reason to trust what official Israeli government spokespersons say about such matters, while David Ketzmer's book on the Israeli Supreme Court, The Occupation of Justice...(2002) provides us with ample reason not to defer to...
21.02.11 | |

24 May

...“armed attacks” in self defense. Many states also recognize at least some limited customary right post-UN Charter of anticipatory self-defense – that is, a right to strike before the enemy begins its attack. This notion was captured by the Caroline letter’s statement requiring for such force “the necessity of self-defence, instant, overwhelming, leaving no choice of means, and no moment for deliberation.” Either way, whether force is in response to an armed attack or in anticipation of an imminent one, if a state undertakes such action, its response must be,...
24.05.13 | |

20 Oct

...rich Saudis to fund it, and among the richest Saudis are Saudi princes. You could at least, in the interest of common courtesy (a) retain the link to the Schwarzschild post when you repost my response, because otherwise you are not really reposting my response, you are selectively reposting part of it; and (b) acknowledge that YOU read something in to my princes remark that wasn't there. And, if you want to add another update, I'll endorse what Anne wrote, that HRW's support of the Goldstone report puts it in...
20.10.09 | |

15 Jan

The current issue of Foreign Affairs has an article called A Few Dollars at a Time: How to Tap Consumers for Development, which describes the “innovative financing” movement in which private companies find ways for their customers to contribute to international development. This morning, I came across an example that I guess you could call “innovative aid” as it isn’t so much development financing but rather disaster relief to Haiti. Zynga is a software company that makes (wildly successful, as I understand) games playable via Facebook and MySpace. They have...
15.01.10 | |

10 Sep

Charter did not permit an individual to be convicted solely of criminal membership; he could be convicted of criminal membership only if he had committed at least one substantive crime as part of the criminal organization. Indeed, both the Ministries and Einsatzgruppen tribunals held exactly that (see pp. 293 of my book.) Here, of course, the response will no doubt be that al-Bahlul was convicted “in connection with any act of which the individual may be convicted” — namely, material support for terrorism. In which case a conviction for one...
10.09.11 | |

23 Jun

...because international law entitles only the members of a state’s regular armed forces to participate in hostilities, the CIA had no authority under international law to use armed force against al-Awlaki. The CIA is not part of the US’s regular armed forces. There is, of course, an obvious response to that objection: namely, that the availability of the PAJ depends on domestic US law, not on international law, so it is irrelevant whether the CIA had the right under international law to used armed force against al-Awlaki. Because AQAP was...
23.06.14 | |

18 Apr

the terms of those treaties. Article 9 of the constitution itself allowed the Rada, a political organ, the discretion to retain the treaties in force and thus make them part of the national law of the Ukraine, without the need to amend the constitution. jagemamerka Response...This is a most useful exchange on some of the most vexing issues of our time and which will make the quest for international justice the richer: it doesn't matter who wins or looses for now. Hostage Response... it doesn’t matter who wins or looses...
18.04.14 | |

17 Nov

...pretty good Navy. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Letter_of_marque Richard Response... Anyone interested in US naval doctrine regarding the law of naval warfare should look at the Commander's Handbook on that subject, http://www.nwc.navy.mil/cnws/ild/documents/1-14M_(Jul_2007)_(NWP).pdf. It's a tri-service (USN/USMC/USCG) publication and covers the use of force across the spectrum of maritime contingencies, including piracy. Rob Isn't the British order to ignore pirates a violation of UNCLOS? Bandit Meanwhile, the British have instructed their navy to ignore pirates, out of the remarkable fear that any captured Somali pirates might have asylum claims on metropolitan Britain. As we all...
17.11.08 | |

08 Jan

...to Microsoft, of course, Microsoft alone is in possession of this information. It has been days and Microsoft has not offered this background information to the public. Tell us, then, (1) what Chinese authority contacted Microsoft about Mr. An Ti; (2) did they order or request the blog be shut down; (3) what legal justification did they provide; (4) what was Microsoft's response; (5) what was Microsoft legal counsel's response; (6) did Microsoft legal counsel agree with this assessment that a national law had been broken; (7) what notice did...
08.01.06 | |

08 Oct

...a state actor, the response must comply with the United Nations Charter and customary international law. On the other hand, if the attacker is a non-state actor, domestic criminal law will likely govern the response. In addition, international law requires a state to characterize an attack to avoid using force against an entity that inadvertently launched a cyber attack. A state may be able to use force against a hostile attack under its own laws, but international law prohibits the use of force against an inadvertent attack. When a state...
08.10.07 | |

09 Mar

...is not a man known for sticking to his word. Even more, the conflict was escalating and the humanitarian situation was deteriorating even before the ICC drama began in July, with no apparent opening for any kind of way out, messy or otherwise. This recent history explains why Kleinman’s response to Michelle’s question was a non-answer: she was asking him to explain his long-term solution for Darfur, not his short-term solution. And his response was… silence. That is an unacceptable position for someone who so savagely criticizes anyone who dares...
09.03.09 | |