In association with the International Commission of Jurists

Recent Posts

08 Oct

The Boston Globe is running a multi-part story on how the Bush Administration is channeling increasing amounts of foreign aid through faith-based organizations, allegedly breaching the church-state divide in the process. However the constitutional doctrine applies (with the wild card of extraterritoriality), one can find an obvious silver lining here: creating a core Republican constituency for foreign assistance. That’s...

|
06 Oct

The story here, without many details. (HT: Orin Kerr at VC.) This adds Harvard to Michigan and Hofstra as schools that require IL in the first year, but Harvard's move obviously increases the probability of a cascade (look at what's happened in the wake of Harvard College's decision on early admissions). Several others schools include IL-related courses...

|
06 Oct

I recently posted to SSRN my forthcoming article, "Medellin, Norm Portals, and the Horizontal Integration of International Human Rights," which will be published later this year by the Notre Dame Law Review. As always, I welcome any comments (either on line or via email). Here's the abstract: The Medellin v. Dretke line of capital cases challenging U.S. non-compliance with...

|
06 Oct

Larry Solum has kicked off an interesting exchange on interdisciplinary ignorance among legal academics. My question: how do international law scholars line up against their peers on this measure? My hunch is that IL scholars are more likely to have some interdisciplinary grounding than lawprofs in other fields, for two reasons. First, there was the payoff of...

|
05 Oct

Today, Seton Hall Law School is hosting a Guantanomo “Teach-In.” Here’s how the steering committee co-chairs, Mark Denbeaux and Alan Sussman describe the event: With more than 200 schools in at least 44 states already participating, "Guantánamo: How Should We Respond?” is an unprecedented collaborative effort of academia, journalism, religion, medicine and even the military in exploring the...

|
05 Oct

Lost amidst the blizzard of legislation and memorandum (and congressional teenage sex scandals) is this presidential declaration of policy against "destructive fisheries practices." Bush has placed the administration behind an Australian-led effort at the U.N. General Assembly to ban "bottom fishing" via trawlers, thought to cause serious environmental damage (see the Wapo article here). The General Assembly is...

|
04 Oct

In case you missed it, the Supreme Court is now offering same-day transcripts of oral arguments. The first example came in the immigration case of Lopez v. Gonzalez. Don't miss the end of the transcript where there is an extremely useful index. If you want to see whether the oral argument in this statutory construction case addressed...

|
04 Oct

With the Supreme Court's new term now underway I was interested in exploring the cases on the docket relevant to our field. So far it appears that the docket is remarkably thin in terms of cases that relate to foreign relations, international law and/or comparative constitutionalism. Of course, it is possible and even likely that more interesting IL/IR...

|
03 Oct

Don't worry, this post is not about President Bush's authority to exercise "unreviewable statutory authority" in the war on terrorism. Rather, it is about how President Bush does get to exercise "unreviewable statutory authority" in the administration of U.S. trade laws. Yesterday, the U.S. Supreme Court denied certiorari in Motion Systems v. Bush, a case challenging President Bush's...

|
03 Oct

As the only candidate to receive the approval of all five permanent members of the UN Security Council, South Korean Foreign Minister Ban Ki-Moon seems certain to become the eighth Secretary-General of the United Nations. The pre-voting procedure of the Security Council involves a series of "straw polls" to indicate whether Security Council members encourage, discourage, or have no...

|
03 Oct

My vote for the most important international law case in the month of September is the ECJ decision in Commission v. Netherlands. The case is important in articulating the standard for the free movement of capital and affirming the protections guaranteed to foreign investors under the EC Treaty. It is another significant blow to government practices put in...

|