Logo Logo Logo Logo Logo

In association with the International Commission of Jurists

  • Topics ↓
    • General
    • Use of Force
    • International Criminal Law
    • International Humanitarian Law
    • International Human Rights Law
    • Environmental Law
    • Trade & Economic Law
    • Law of the Sea
    • National Security Law
    • Foreign Relations Law
    • Organizations
  • Regions ↓
    • Africa
    • Asia-Pacific
    • Europe
    • Latin & South America
    • Middle East
    • North America
  • Announcements ↓
    • Events
    • Calls for Papers
    • Jobs
  • Symposia ↓
    • Books
    • Articles
    • Themes
  • Media ↓
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Contributors
  • Submissions
  • About
  • Donate
  • Fresh Squeezed! Podcast
  • Topics ↓

    • General
    • Use of Force
    • International Criminal Law
    • International Humanitarian Law
    • International Human Rights Law
    • Environmental Law
    • Trade & Economic Law
    • Law of the Sea
    • National Security Law
    • Foreign Relations Law
    • Organizations
  • Regions ↓

    • Africa
    • Asia-Pacific
    • Europe
    • Latin & South America
    • Middle East
    • North America
  • Announcements ↓

    • Events
    • Calls for Papers
    • Jobs
  • Symposia ↓

    • Books
    • Articles
    • Themes
  • Media ↓
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Contributors
  • Submissions
  • About
  • Donate
  • Fresh Squeezed! Podcast

Chances of Airstrikes and Seahawks

05 Feb Chances of Airstrikes and Seahawks

05.02.06 | 0 Comments

Chances of an airstrike on Iran by March 2007? About 35%, almost the same chances that the Seattle Seahawks will win the Super Bowl today. Compare the betting line here and here.


Price for Super Bowl XL Winner. Sun Feb 05 at TradeSports.com

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Topics
General

Share

  • Email
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • WhatsApp
  • Print

Related

No Comments

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

About Author
Avatar

Roger Alford

Recent Posts
  • Minding the Gap, Properly: Conflict Classification, Protected Persons, and What the Geneva Conventions Already Require (Part II) – A Reply to Alexandria Virginski
  • Minding the Gap, Properly: Conflict Classification, Protected Persons, and What the Geneva Conventions Already Require (Part I) – A Reply to Alexandria Virginski
  • Widening the Crime, Narrowing the Machinery: What the June 2026 Amendment Record Shows About the Crimes Against Humanity Convention
  • Autonomous Weapons Systems Mini-Symposium: Beyond Yes or No – The Decisions States will Make this Year on Autonomous Weapons
  • Free Elections and “Turning Down the Noise” on Online Platforms

© Opinio Juris | Design by Open & Honest | In association with the International Commission of Jurists

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.