Search: self-defense
08 Aug A Partial Defense of Hamdan and Judge Roberts
I also want to welcome Professor D’Amato to Opinio Juris. And, in the typical Opinio Juris fashion, I want to welcome him by immediately taking exception to some of the arguments he put forward in his inaugural post. I agree that Judge Roberts should be held responsible for the D.C. Circuit’s decision in Hamdan as much as if he had written the opinion for the Court. I simply don’t find that decision as troubling as Professor D’Amato seems to. First, I guess I don’t find the D.C. Circuit’s...26 Jul International Law in the U.S. Supreme Court: A Partial Defense of “Insider Doctrinal History”
...What’s missing, in short, is society.” (p. 173) For Witt, what’s required instead is a social history of the Court and international law. What should we make of this critique? Based on my previous post worrying that the social, political, and cultural context of the Court’s work might be obscured by the book’s grand narrative, one might expect me to agree with Witt. And at a certain level, I do. In fact, I’ve previously made a call for exactly that kind of social history myself. And yet, I can’t help...20 Sep Detention in NIAC — A Reply to Wittes and Chesney (and a Defense of Vladeck)
...geographically connected to a NIAC. Wittes and Chesney’s claim that those rules permit the detention of anyone who “materially support” terrorism is still questionable. Most importantly, nothing in conventional IHL explicitly authorizes detaining anyone in NIAC. Common Article 3 and the Second Additional Protocol impose restrictions on how detainees can be treated; they do not authorize detention itself. That does not mean, of course, that IHL is silent concerning detention in NIAC. It is still possible that such detention is inherent in conventional IHL or that there is a customary...30 Jan Investment Protection in Extraordinary Times: A Reply to Professor Franck
...fall within the scope of the NPM clause from the substantive protections of the BIT and thereby preclude liability. Professor Franck is correct to note that in most cases the affirmative defense of necessity in customary international law should be unnecessary where a BIT contains an NPM clause. More specifically, where a treaty contains an NPM clause of comprehensive scope, the narrow necessity defense under customary law will generally not become relevant. NPM clauses are generally drafted to provide states greater flexibility to respond to emergency situations than would have...
10 Nov Security Challenges in the Black Sea: Military Exercise or a Navy Blockade? Analysis of the Russian Navy Activities in Bulgaria’s Exclusive Economic Zone in the Black Sea
...of the country, as the ships will be not only protected by the state, itself but in case of an armed attack of a vessel, Bulgaria could invoke Article 5 as a NATO member state. Despite the increased shipping distance, merchant ships’ security in the Black Sea will be better guaranteed if they pass by the territorial waters of Romania and Bulgaria to Turkey avoiding the EEZ zones. Bulgaria cannot currently use its EEZ zone effectively and high defense investment is necessary in its navy and coastal defense in case...
06 Dec Symposium in Remembrance of Judge Antônio Augusto Cançado Trindade: A Formalist’s Defense of Judge Antonio Cançado Trindade
[Moisés A. Montiel Mogollón is a Professor at the Faculty of Law at the Universidad Iberoamericana, Mexico City Campus and Universidad Panamericana, Guadalajara campus (Mexico).] Summary The late judge Antonio Cançado Trindade is often criticized by legal formalism on account of his interpretive elasticity when positive law failed to meet the most “elementary dictates of public conscience”. This piece -a homage from the enemy trenches- aims to reclaim his contributions and frame them as a necessary reminder for law-makers and operators, rigorous and meticulous in the method...