it
self. This “treaty supremacy” rule, Sloss notes, survived essentially unchallenged until the period immediately following World War II. However, early on, the federal courts adopted an interpretation of the Supremacy Clause according to which some treaties (denominated “non-
self-executing”) were considered not to have effect unless legislatively implemented. As Sloss notes, the “non-
self-execution” doctrine dates back to Chief Justice Marshall’s opinion in Foster v. Neilson (1829). Properly understood, however, this doctrine spoke only to the allocation of authority to implement treaties at the federal level, between the legislature and the executive,...
14.02.17
|
David Stewart
|