Search: self-defense

...military assistance to Ukraine do so openly and have justified their conduct by arguing that it aims to assist the victim of aggression to exercise its individual right of self-defense to repel an armed attack. There is remarkable consistency in the relevant statements by the EU, the USA, the UK and Germany. It is interesting that the assisting States do not invoke the right of collective self-defense, as this is a ground enabling the lawful use of force and would as a matter of principle make these States parties to...

As was widely reported in the media, Khamis al-Obeidi, a defense attorney for Saddam and his half-brother Barzan Ibrahim, was murdered two weeks ago. Al-Obeidi is the third defense attorney to be killed during the trial. Human Rights Watch has released a statement regarding the need to protect defense counsel — current and future — appearing before the Iraqi High tribunal. With their permission, I am reproducing it in full: The brutal murder of Iraqi lawyer Khamis Al-Obeidi, defense counsel for former Iraqi President Saddam Hussein, underlines the urgent need...

...of arms than its predecessors. On paper, there is reason to be optimistic: the Court has adopted comprehensive regulations governing the qualifications required of defense counsel and the provision of resources to the defense. In terms of qualifications, the ICC requires all defense counsel to have at least 10 years experience in international or criminal law and procedure, including relevant experience – whether as judge, prosecutor, or defense attorney – in criminal proceedings. Moreover, the Court has created an Office of Public Counsel for the defense that is responsible for...

...a backdoor way of amending the Charter without going through the difficult process of amending the Charter. A far better and more fruitful exercise is to examine article 51 of the UN Charter more closely. Article 51 preserves the inherent right of individual or collective self-defense, or what the French-language version of the Charter refers to as the droit naturel de legitimate defense. The right to legitimate defense (which covers both self- and other-defense) is a natural law right. It isn’t created by the UN Charter or by positive law...

...a belligerent still has responsibilities under int'l law. It is certainly possible to conclude that the old regiime is no longer the legitimate govt. of Syria, esp. under Univ. Dec. H.R. art. 21(3) and major developments in the law of self-determination. It is possible for the legitimate rep. of the people of Syria to request aid that would be considered to be self-determination assistance and/or collective self-defents (since self-defense under customary int'l law is not merely a right of a state or a "govt."). Certainly, international law has never been...

...as many defense agents as possible into their platform ecosystem. By rapidly exploiting these network effects and scaling up this way, the most successful defense tech companies set out to disrupt the defense market in the years to come. Early movers such as Shield AI, Anduril, Rebellion Defense, and Palantir are rewarded by this model and raise the most funding from venture capital. They are now starting to compete with industrial defense companies, either directly by building the military hardware themselves or by partnering up and renting out software solutions...

...one assumes ‘no Security Council authorization’, is to argue not just that’s it’s legitimate, but that it is actually legal. In rough terms, this means appeal to self-defense (including the defense of others who can’t defend themselves) from aggression as an on-going customary law right, including under the Charter. The legal argument then runs to a point crucial in many justifications of humanitarian intervention under “Responsibility to Protect” (R2P). Self-defense, or defense of others, can run not just to defending a state, but to defending a state’s own people. Including...

the defending state to effectuate the total military defeat of the aggressor and potentially even topple its government. When such extensive aims may lawfully be the object of self-defense, the comprehensive use of armed force—such as the prolonged occupation of the aggressor state’s territory—may constitute a proportionate measure of self-defense under the jus ad bellum. In the context of the Israeli-Palestinian IAC, the salience of this point is obvious if considered in concrete terms. Understood exclusively in reference to its origins in the Six Day War, Israel’s present occupation of...

...cases in which states were entitled to use force. These included restoring the balance of power and preserving the political equilibrium between the great powers of Europe, suppressing revolts and threats to monarchical rule, recovering public or private debts, avenging injuries or insults to citizens or damages to their property or interests, enforcing treaty obligations, implementing arbitral awards, upholding the right to engage in commerce, and protecting religious minorities. To justify intervention in these situations, a variety of doctrines were invoked, such as self-defense, self-help, necessity, reprisals, and retorsions. Ultimately,...

...and ask in what context is the term ‘self-defence’ being used. Our chapter is about an individual claiming self-defence when facing potential criminal (or disciplinary) charges. It is not about a State’s right of self-defence under article 51 UN Charter (or customary international law).. Whether or not a State has a right to use force in national self-defence is a separate and distinct issue from whether an individual is not guilty of crime under the relevant self-defence provisions pertaining in a particular criminal jurisdiction. Combatant’s privilege Self-defence has a narrower...

...ad bellum arguments may be used in interpreting IHL. (M. Sassòli, A.A Bouvier, et al., How Does Law Protect In War? ICRC, Vol. I, 2006, p. 103)   Occupation Law and Self-Determination In light of the second question, I argue that a situation of occupation may end with self-determination. However, resorting to self-determination may only be justified once the effective control of the occupant over the territory is completely relinquished and the process of self-determination is free from any third-party interference, particularly by the former occupant. Furthermore, self-determination, if exercised...

...in the past (including some intense back-and-forth between Kevin Heller and Marty Lederman). I wanted to make two quick points about the nature of this debate. First, I think the discourse is focused far too much on customary international law, which to my mind is of limited–or even no–relevance to the issue. (In this respect, various statements regarding self-defense from the ICJ, including in Nicaragua, have contributed to this confusion.) In reality, the law of self-defense is a question of treaty interpretation, governed by article 51, which recognizes and preserves,...