Search: palestine icc

...story of Palestine through the story of a rural family echoes Eghbariah’s idea of the Nakba as an experience of subjugation that is simultaneously collective and individual. The temporal dimensions of the series (spanning the decades between 1933-1967) and its spatial symbolisms (first the village, then the refugee-camp and finally the diaspora) capture poignantly Eghbariah’s idea of the Nakba involving a transformation from violent rupture to an ongoing, evolving structure of fragmentation that keeps Palestinians forever captive within a liminal state between freedom and oppression, genocide and endurance, elimination and...

...basic services, and support for the Palestinian people’s right to self-determination. As already observed by Marko Milanovic and Eliav Lieblich, the Court was on almost all points unanimous, with Judge Sebutinde dissenting on points mostly pertaining to the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA). This request follows two prior advisory opinions in relation to Palestine, namely the ICJ’s advisory opinion on the Wall from 2004, and the advisory opinion on the Legal Consequences arising from the Policies and Practices of Israel in...

...its ‘de facto control’ and under another State’s peacefully established administration to acquire the territory, the deployment would be likely to amount to acquisition of territory by force. Japan mentioned this in its oral submission on the Palestine Advisory Opinion and the separate opinion of Judge Cleveland on the Palestine Advisory Opinion quoted this part (para. 29). The concept of peacefulness derives partly from the Eritrea-Ethiopia Claims Commission’s Partial Award on Jus ad Bellum: Ethiopia’s laims 1-8 (19 Dec 2005). In this report the Commission found that Eritrea violated article...

...comparison not only to numerous other situations under preliminary examination, but even — and more importantly — to the situational gravity of the Palestine situation as a whole. As I have argued previously, the last thing the OTP should do is investigate one very small part of the much larger conflict between Israel and Palestine. If it ever takes the Palestine situation on, it needs to look at crimes committed by both sides throughout Palestinian territory. There is, however, an even more significant problem with the Final Decision’s standard for...

...it was only one small part of the much larger situation in Palestine and because it involved only crimes committed by Israel. As I’ve said time and again, if the OTP ever does open a formal investigation into the situation in Palestine, it needs to investigate both Israeli and Palestinian crimes equally – and needs to investigate those crimes everywhere they were committed. I am also baffled why, given that it was declining to open a formal investigation, the OTP thought it was a good idea to conclude that there...

what are the legal consequences that arise for all States and the United Nations from this status? In brief, the UNGA has tasked the ICJ with assessing the (il)legality of Israel’s occupation of the oPt/State of Palestine, rather than a piecemeal analysis of Israel’s violations. The question follows from two recent UN-mandated reports which concluded that Israel’s occupation of the oPt/State of Palestine is unlawful: by the current Special Rapporteur on the Situation of Human Rights in the Palestinian Territories Occupied Since 1967, Francesca Albanese; and by the recently established...

...had forged an alliance with Arab nationalists who wanted to drive the Jewish refugees out of Palestine — a murderous version of German-Arab friendship founded on common hatred of Jews. Jews living in the Middle East were petrified by Rommel’s victories. After seizing the British fortress of Tobruk in Libya in June 1942 he set his sights on the Suez Canal, on Palestine and the oil fields of the Middle East. “Those fighting Jewry can always rely on the sympathy of the Arab population,” the German army general staff wrote...

...the constitutive theory. (ch. 2.2.b.) The declaratory theory, which is generally favoured under international law, treats statehood as an objective status determined by the fulfilment of specific criteria. In contrast, the constitutive theory maintains that legal statehood comes into being only through recognition by other states. The ongoing discourse surrounding the recognition of Palestine exemplifies how statehood in international law is frequently influenced more by selective political will than by objective legal criteria. Despite persistent contention, a compelling argument can be made that Palestine fulfils the primary requirements delineated in...

borders, Jerusalem, refugees, and settlements. It also supports a comprehensive peace settlement between Israel and Lebanon and Israel and Syria, as soon as possible. If you interpret the Annapolis Agreement as a commitment by Palestine and Israel to “immediately implement” the Road Map, it means that, at a minimum, Palestine and Israel have promised in the very near future to begin down the road of peace, starting with Phase I. This includes Palestine renouncing terrorism and recognizing Israel’s right to exist and Israel recognizing Palestine’s sovereignty and withdrawing from key...

Last week I had the good fortune to attend a reception in Washington D.C. with various arbitration luminaries announcing the inauguration of the Jerusalem Arbitration Center. With almost $5 billion in annual trade between Palestine and Israel, it is imperative to establish a neutral forum for resolving business disputes. JAC is established under the auspices of the International Chamber of Commerce. Zahi Khouri and Yara Asad of ICC Palestine and Oren Schachor and Baruch Mazor of ICC Israel were on hand to announce the partnership. JAC’s goal is to establish,...

...doing what needs ti be done to protect and defend civilians. Howard Gilbert I should again point to the Korean War. As with Israel/Palestine, Korea was at the start of the war a former single country in which two governments had effective control of two zones of occupation. It is clear that North/South Korea and Israel/Palestine were going to become two countries, but at the time (then and now) some governments did not recognize the DPRK and some did not recognize the ROK (and some do not recognize the PLA...

Hostage In Kletter v Dulles the United States District Court, District of Colombia ruled that Palestine was a foreign state and that naturalization under Palestinian law constituted an act of expatriation under United States law: "The contention of the plaintiff that Palestine, while under the League of Nations Mandate, was not a foreign state within the meaning of the statute is wholly without merit." and "Furthermore, it is not for the judiciary, but for the political branches of the Government to determine that Palestine was a foreign state. This the...