In association with the International Commission of Jurists

Search: extraterritorial sanctions

04 Jan

...And in response to Benjamin G. Davis, who seems to think that somehow US extraterritorial taxation is fair because of the exclusions: frankly, you have no idea what you are talking about. The problem is that most people in the rest of the world pay a lot of VAT/or GST/HST--the United States doesn't have a national sales tax. Most of Europe and Canada does. Furthermore the earned income exclusion doesn't count against investment income--including many registered accounts in Canada (RESP, RDSP, TFSA). Finally, you cannot count taxes paid under the...
04.01.12 | |

04 Jun

...from genocide and crimes against humanity, they do not believe that all gaps in the express protections of international humanitarian law are filled by international human rights law -- particularly in extraterritorial aspects of armed conflict. The reason for the latter view -- in full disclosure one that I share -- is that modern international humanitarian law consists of conventional and customary constraints on what might otherwise be considered a proper measure to defeat an enemy. In other words, it generally requires that the measures employed in armed conflict be...
04.06.10 | |

27 Mar

...origins of U.S. thought on the applicability of human rights in armed conflict. Apart from the historical U.S. view, my suspicion is that a true empirical (both qualitative and quantitative) analysis of state practice in armed conflict would yield scant data supporting the extraterritorial applicability of most human rights law (meaning other than crimes against humanity) or its broad applicability in even internal armed conflict. If that is historically true or at least debatable, then in my humble opinion the burden is not on the Obama administration to demonstrate the...
27.03.10 | |

05 Apr

...believe international law does not constrain covert operations, at least from the perspective of U.S. domestic law. First, we must remember that Title 50 operations may be authorized as an integral part of an armed conflict or in the absence of one. Thus, IHL may or may not be triggered and apply to a covert operation or program, and IHRL would apply only to the extent one accepts (contrary to long held official U.S. views) that IHRL applies to a nation's extraterritorial actions. Regardless of whether either body of international...
05.04.13 | |

18 Apr

...the plaintiffs to re-file their complaints against the US defendants to overcome the new Kiobel extraterritoriality presumption. This means that she is willing to explore in greater detail the Kiobel requirement that plaintiffs’ claims “touch and concern” the territory of the U.S. with sufficient force to displace the presumption against extraterritoriality. Will knowledge by the US parent of the subsidiaries’ activities in South Africa be enough? Will receiving profits from the subsidiaries be enough? I assume that is the best the plaintiffs will be able to plead is knowledge by...
18.04.14 | |

25 May

...(if, in my view, unfortunate) position that ICCPR doesn’t apply extraterritorially (which the report acknowledges), this seems a bit of a tough legal case to make. Beyond the trial situation (to which it seems CA3 would surely apply), as long as we’re choosing between legal regimes the United States officially rejects, why not pick APII, or API by analogy, as the more useful standard? Truly asking here. Finally (for now, I’m still catching up), former State Department Legal Adviser John Bellinger and his former State Department colleague (and soon-to-be Vanderbilt...
25.05.11 | |

12 Apr

...cloud' of the fighters. How do we know which cloud reigns supreme? I doubt the notion of IHL being the lex specialis would apply here. A clash of clouds and proportionality doctrines indeed. RJ1983 There equally seems to be a problem in the assumption that IHRL is applicable to the operations of a State on foreign territory. The substantive HR obligations are limited to territory and jurisdiction, and the HR bodies and courts have been very reluctant to accept extraterritorial application of human rights. Sure, HR has an impact on...
12.04.13 | |

13 Apr

...the British Right, and particularly on the more 'conservative' newspapers - and, of course, on the yellow press of whatever persuasion. The Conservatives have even vowed to repeal the Human Rights Act if elected. Not that they seem to have the faintest idea what the Act does, mind you... da23will There's certainly a strong policy argument against extending the extraterritorial application of HR treaties too far if it means that states are going to refrain from arresting pirates on the high seas, for fear that they'll be unable to return...
13.04.08 | |

20 Feb

...Court in Quirin and Yamashita, among other cases. It also has not been superseded by domestic legislation or conventional IHL, though I wish to do more research and theoretical work on this. By the way Dave...in the follow-on article to this one I have just mentioned (which discusses the propriety of applying this domestic common law to conduct in an extraterritorial armed conflict under both domestic and itnernational law), I cite your military commissions article a fair amount. If you are interested in reviewing the next article before I submit...
20.02.09 | |

17 Oct

Bo Rutledge Further to Roger's excellent post, readers should recall that the SG has filed on these sorts of issues before. When the South Africa cases first went up on cert, the SG took the unusual step of filing an unsolicited amicus brief in support of cert [Disclosure - I represented and continue to represent an amicus in that case]. The guts of that brief argued that the ATS did not authorize extraterritorial assertions of jurisdiction on the basis of aid/abet liability. I have always admired the principled nature in...
17.10.11 | |

05 Jan

...it seems to me, is prevent the plaintiffs from trying to enforce the judgment in the U.S. -- and to hold them in contempt if they do. Am I missing something? Ted Folkman Kevin, If I hear you right, the issue is the extraterritorial nature of the order. It seems to me that it's well established that because "equity operates in personam", as the hoary maxim goes, a court with personal jurisdiction over the defendant can make orders that require the defendant to act in other jurisdictions. Just to take...
05.01.12 | |

11 Apr

...which they have no expertise. Jordan "With friends like these...." Fortunately, the early cases and ops. of AG's demonstrate the extraterritorial reach of the ATCA (ATS) in suits involving alien plaintiffs against alien or U.S. national defendants with respect to violations of international law over which there is universal jurisdiction, esp. so that the U.S. does not engage in a "denial of justice" to aliens. Also, today, more jobs for our graduates as plaintiff and defense lawyers, judges, etc. -- good for the U.S. economy! If other countries want to...
11.04.13 | |