In association with the International Commission of Jurists

Search: extraterritorial sanctions

23 Mar

...student ponders why Argentina wasn’t bailed out like banks were in 2008 or Credit Suisse is today. Was a state of 50 million not too big to fail? Are odious debt and economic sanctions not also expressions of unlawful force? They quote Special Rapporteur Alena Douhan favourably; what’s the point of UN mechanisms if Euro-America can deploy international law with tactical impunity? A final student asks about the status of Palestine. If it declares itself a state, if 140 states recognise it as a state, is it not a state?...
23.03.23 | |

05 Jan

...it seems to me, is prevent the plaintiffs from trying to enforce the judgment in the U.S. -- and to hold them in contempt if they do. Am I missing something? Ted Folkman Kevin, If I hear you right, the issue is the extraterritorial nature of the order. It seems to me that it's well established that because "equity operates in personam", as the hoary maxim goes, a court with personal jurisdiction over the defendant can make orders that require the defendant to act in other jurisdictions. Just to take...
05.01.12 | |

13 Mar

...this has nothing to do with civil law and common law - if you do not charge your English cousins to have become civil lawyers. Certainly, I also regard Afghanistan/Pakistan as an armed conflict, albeit of a non-international character. Consequently, they are a matter of criminal law, including its extraterritorial application, subject to the strictures of common article 3 of the Geneva Conventions and the customary law of Article 75 Additional Protocol I. Other terrorist acts have been simply that - heinous and cowardly crimes, some of them of an...
13.03.09 | |

11 Apr

...which they have no expertise. Jordan "With friends like these...." Fortunately, the early cases and ops. of AG's demonstrate the extraterritorial reach of the ATCA (ATS) in suits involving alien plaintiffs against alien or U.S. national defendants with respect to violations of international law over which there is universal jurisdiction, esp. so that the U.S. does not engage in a "denial of justice" to aliens. Also, today, more jobs for our graduates as plaintiff and defense lawyers, judges, etc. -- good for the U.S. economy! If other countries want to...
11.04.13 | |

13 Apr

...doesn't end up in the dock, and even if the Vatican doesn't cancel the visit, I am optimistic that we shall raise public consciousness to the point where the British government will find it very awkward indeed to go ahead with the Pope's visit, let alone pay for it. Richard" David Note that Pope Gregory XIII claimed extraterritorial jurisdiction over England in declaring Queen Elizabeth I to be a usurper and sending various armies and assassins to kill her. Turnabout? Nick Donovan I think this is a media story, nothing...
13.04.10 | |

04 Jun

...the mandate of the Human Rights Council, which raises a whole other set of legitimacy issues) does not have the mandate to report on issues related to the conduct of hostilities that rise to the level of armed conflict under the laws of war. The implied, underlying US position actually consists of at least two things: one, that the human rights law to which the special rapporteur’s mandate extends, the ICCPR, does not extend extraterritorially at least as far as the US is concerned and, two, that these human rights...
04.06.09 | |

29 Apr

...to be something different. Although perhaps not what Koh's critics have it mind, I would view transnational law as where the lines between the domestic and the international blur. Transnational law seems focused on the actions of domestic, nonstate actors and their attempts to address global challenges. When I think of transnational law, I do not think of international treaties or even customary international law, but rather the acts of domestic actors and domestic courts, exercising universal jurisdiction or applying extraterritorial domestic laws, in an attempt to exert international influence....
29.04.09 | |

28 Feb

...that recognize human rights duties of private corporations. See foreign cases in http://ssrn.com/abstract=1548112 And the jurisdictional basis is universal jurisdiction. see. e.g., http://ssrn.com/abstract=1497122 re: older cases under ATCA (ATS) and universal jurisdiction (in a footnote). Of course, even under the Restatement, when there is universal jurisdiction there is no need for contacts with the forum. Id. sec. 404. And the putative use of comity-factors to obviate territorial jurisdiction (in violation of the separation of powers because Congress and the President will have chosen to create an extraterritorial statute and the...
28.02.12 | |

29 Nov

...folk hero. While some question the legality of his actions, others, both internationally and domestically, have heralded his actions as bringing about exactly the sort of transparency that is needed in American government. Regardless of one's view on the matter, criminal charges would certainly be extremely controversial both at home and abroad. Gautam Is the Espionage Act valid extra-territorially? Or will the exercise of jurisdiction rest upon a principle such as the effects doctrine? Max My understanding is that while § 793 has some extraterritorial application (see the useful CRS...
29.11.10 | |

17 Oct

Bo Rutledge Further to Roger's excellent post, readers should recall that the SG has filed on these sorts of issues before. When the South Africa cases first went up on cert, the SG took the unusual step of filing an unsolicited amicus brief in support of cert [Disclosure - I represented and continue to represent an amicus in that case]. The guts of that brief argued that the ATS did not authorize extraterritorial assertions of jurisdiction on the basis of aid/abet liability. I have always admired the principled nature in...
17.10.11 | |

13 Mar

...states, and between a state, or the citizens thereof, and foreign states, citizens or subjects." Const. Art. III § 2. Nom Err, Ben. I understand you speak in jest, but citizenship is an idependent basis for extraterritorial jurisdiction, so your citizenship makes clear you can be reached by US law even when overseas. The question is whether it applies to non-citizens when they are not within US territory. See US v. Verdugo-Urquidez, 494 U.S. 259 (1990)(Fourth Amendment does not apply to US agents breaking into a Mexican's home in Mexico)....
13.03.08 | |

27 Mar

...origins of U.S. thought on the applicability of human rights in armed conflict. Apart from the historical U.S. view, my suspicion is that a true empirical (both qualitative and quantitative) analysis of state practice in armed conflict would yield scant data supporting the extraterritorial applicability of most human rights law (meaning other than crimes against humanity) or its broad applicability in even internal armed conflict. If that is historically true or at least debatable, then in my humble opinion the burden is not on the Obama administration to demonstrate the...
27.03.10 | |