In association with the International Commission of Jurists

Search: extraterritorial sanctions

20 Nov

...Council Sanctions Committee, including a determination as to whether the reasons for sanctions listings by the Council were well founded in fact. I argue that the assumption of such authority by courts to review decisions sourced in international institutions could be regarded as a move as revolutionary as Marbury v Madison and equivalent kairotic moments across domestic jurisdictions. It is not a move that should be made without significant thought being given to the legitimizing foundations of judicial authority in this context. When domestic and regional courts engage in such...
20.11.13 | |

12 Feb

...has monitored Malta’s investigation and is threatening more action if Malta’s investigation is compromised. In regards to Saudi Arabia and Russia, there have been mixed actions. For Saudi Arabia, the US enacted sanctions in response to the murder of Khashoggi and has threatened further action if Saudi Arabia does not pursue proper justice. There has been some concern whether Trump is doing enough, because many feel Trump has not taken a harsh enough tone against Saudi Arabia. The EU has called for more transparency and is threatening sanctions. Regarding the...
12.02.20 | |

20 Feb

...a 2025 World Bank report, Syria’s economy has been severely damaged by 14 years of conflict and international sanctions, with GDP shrinking by more than 50 percent since 2010. Around 16.5 million Syrians need humanitarian assistance, and nearly 90 percent of the population lives below the poverty line, while about 60 percent suffers from food insecurity. Reconstruction costs are estimated at approximately $216 billion, nearly ten times Syria’s current annual GDP.  The most notable positive impact on economic prospects was the gradual lifting of U.S. sanctions. In May 2025, Donald...
20.02.26 | and |

18 Mar

...likely continue to dominate HRDD. As explained below, a company’s reliance on the monitoring and reporting of such schemes might provide a shield to liability. Articles 15-19: Supervisory Authority These five articles together establish the oversight mechanisms that member states should establish to ensure that companies comply with their HRDD obligations. This includes a (fairly vague) process whereby individuals or organizations can come forward with substantiated concerns (Art 18). It also provides that member states can impose administrative sanctions for breach of the directive (Art 19). While these elements are...
18.03.22 | |

11 Jun

...of the States in those countries where they apply? As a global company, we have binding legal obligations in the countries where we’re incorporated. That’s part of the fundamental reality of the internet – it’s a reality that, by and large, has served human rights well–although it’s a reality that’s also under great stress. For example, one particularly difficult example is our obligation, as a U.S. company, to comply with U.S. sanctions regulations (which vary by circumstance) in all the jurisdictions where we operate. Sanctions regulations applicable to Facebook, include...
11.06.21 | |

15 Jul

Elena Kouvabina Many commenters opined that the Dodd-Frank bill will particially reverse the Supreme Court's Morrison decision with respect to the SEC extraterritorial jurisdiction. The bill's provision in question, however, talks about expanding the jurisdiction of federal courts to hear actions brought by the SEC with extraterritorial elements. In Morrison, Justice Scalia stated that the issue of extraterritorial reach of U.S. securities laws is not jurisdictional but substantive. Several other scholars noted the same. To give the SEC the power to try actions with extraterritorial elements under Section 10(b), Section...
15.07.10 | |

17 Jan

..."perfect" complementarity in a state's legal obligations anywhere in the world escapes me. The complementarity of IHRL, particularly the ICCPR, in extraterritorial or transnational NIAC is not at all clear, and imperfect at best. By its terms, the ICCPR applies within the territory and jurisdicition of signatory states, not to extraterritorial matters. Even if we impose a functional definition of "jurisdiction" upon and exclude "territory" from the ICCPR, a competely atextual approach, it can't possibly cover all aspects of extraterritorial NIAC. There is an assumption being made (or teleological interpretation)...
17.01.12 | |

17 Jul

...Breyer argued in his concurrence in Kiobel) that the extraterritorial reach of the Alien Tort Statute can be limited by other jurisdictional restrictions. I agree. Despite the obvious clash of approaches between the Roberts majority and the Breyer minority in Kiobel, they do have an important common ground – an intention to limit extraterritorial jurisdiction through a stricter application of the traditional bases of jurisdiction. The DaimlerChrysler case gives Justice Breyer an opportunity to put sharper teeth, if that’s his inclination, into the third alternative test for finding jurisdiction that...
17.07.13 | |

11 Apr

...those who are not plausibly part of an ongoing armed conflict - there seems to be no mention of the applicability of human rights law or principles as constraints on the use of force. U.S. views on the extraterritorial application of HR law aside, that's a very serious and profound mistake with regards to what law applies. While the law of war conduct of hostilities rules may apply as baseline constraints to any use of force, it doesn't follow that compliance with these rules is all that's required (beyond meeting...
11.04.12 | |

09 Dec

...to veto by, in this case, Russia. Even if sanctions are imposed, will the UN be able to keep them in place? As the oil-for-food scandal makes clear, sanctions create a powerful moral hazard by raising the price of goods and creating the opportunity for huge profits, encouraging defection and cheating. Regardless of whether you agree with the logic of the invasion of Iraq, there is an important lesson there that is relevant to the problem of Iran. If the UN is unwilling or incapable of enforcing its own rules...
09.12.05 | |

28 Sep

...domestic one with a weirdly constructed trigger, invoking a “law of nations” that we don’t mean the way other people mean it, argues strongly for a traditional approach to jurisdiction – it’s not universal jurisdiction anymore, because we’re not pretending that our reference point is actually universal, but instead merely a claim of extraterritoriality. So it doesn’t seem quite so strange that the Chief Justice would invoke the presumption against extraterritoriality, because the thing, the statute, that plaintiffs propose to apply extraterritorially isn’t truly a claim of universality, either. Nor...
28.09.13 | |

21 Dec

Alexander Panayotov The discussion is illuminating. I can hardly imagine a better panel to discuss Prof. Besson’s article given panelists’ recent contributions on different aspects of extraterritoriality. It’s hard to establish a consensus on extraterritoriality. I don’t think that such a consensus is even possible. Still, the introduction of normative theorizing raises a couple of open-ended questions. I will pose them because I think that normative theorizing about extraterritoriality is exceedingly difficult; thus, it entails a great deal of groundwork. I imagine that the article did not engage in this...
21.12.12 | |