Search: drones

...after NATO troops leave the country in 2014, Afghanistan will not be used as a launch pad for US drones. Two Tunisians have been jailed for seven years after posting cartoons of the Prophet Mohammed on Facebook, fueling allegations that new leaders are placing a chokehold on free speech. Invisible Children has released its follow-up video to the viral Kony 2012 sensation: Kony 2012 Part II: Beyond Famous. Ahead of the Easter weekend, the Pope issued a statement reaffirming the ban on female priests in the Catholic Church and underscoring...

...the Congo. The Syrian opposition has decided to boycott international talks, saying that the world has turned its back on the war-torn nation and calling the lack of international action “shameful.” The US has sent 100 troops to Niger to construct a drone base from which Predator drones will operate. In other drone news, a recent study found that drone pilots are susceptible to the same bouts of depression, post-traumatic stress and anxiety as pilots of manned aircraft deployed to Iraq or Afghanistan. Dozens of people have been killed in...

...due diligence standard. To answer this question, it is necessary to examine the economic and military capabilities of the “Great Powers” of the international order – in particular, the US. The US has the world’s largest economy and military. It has thousands of military bases in hundreds of countries on every continent in the world. And it has a blue water navy and a global fleet of fighters, bombers, and drones, among other assets, that are unrivalled by any other single state. In short, the US possesses the means to...

...law, and offers a novel theory of rationality to explain why nations should comply with international law. Ohlin’s research also focuses on the laws of war, in particular the impact of new technology on the regulation of warfare, including remotely piloted drones and the strategy of targeted killings, cyber-warfare, and the role of non-state actors in armed conflicts. His books in this area include Targeted Killings: Law and Morality in an Asymmetrical World (Oxford University Press 2012, with A. Altman & C. Finkelstein); Cyber-War: Law & Ethics for Virtual Conflicts...

One of the highlights of my Fall semester was the opportunity to host a one-day workshop at Temple Law on how autonomous technology may impact the future of international humanitarian law (IHL) and the lawyers who practice it. With co-sponsorship from the International Committee of the Red Cross (specifically, Rob Ramey and Tracey Begley) as well as Gary Brown of Marine Corps University, we wanted to have an inter-disciplinary conversation on the way autonomy may implicate the practice of law across a range of new technologies, including cyberwar, drones, and...

...invasion of international law by twitter-ese (R2P??) is truly obnoxious. Mihai Martoiu Ticu I agree with Kevin. The commander-in-chief is a legal target, as the fellow combatants of the guys killed by drones, can legally bomb the CIA headquarters where the drones are driven, and Obama. Carthago I guess the point of the complaint filed by Gaddafi's family is that he was already a prisoner when he was killed, which makes the killing a war crime. Mihai Martoiu Ticu @Rhodri Posner is just a Machiavellian, who claims that U.S. should...

Howard Gilbert Pakistan can prosecute an American for killing someone in Pakistan, and Article 51 national self-defense is not a legal defense against a charge of murder brought under Pakistani domestic law. There is nothing the US can do here, so the CIA would do well to maintain secrecy and people involved in such operations would do well to vacation in India instead. That is one of the reasons why the premise of the hypothesis is flawed. Currently the CIA operates drones inside Pakistan with the consent and cooperation of...

...family, but I kept up with his scholarship. I didn't agree with his position on drones but he certainly had a rare credibility to hold them based on his direct experience. The last time I saw him, I ran into him briefly at the AALS hiring conference in Washington DC in October 2014. It was a brief conversation--he never told me about his illness. I am stunned that he is gone now, and regret that we didn't get the chance to have one last good talk. Fair winds and following...

...unmanned drones, where there is no need for possible identification when a pilot is shot down, it makes no difference whether the drone's controller is in uniform or not. In essence, on pragmatic grounds, I see a material difference between a CIA officer on the ground shooting al-Aulaqi - where the full panoply of IHL obligations should apply - and the killing him via a drone strike. At minimum, IHL on the subject is not crystal clear. Contrast the ambiguity of IHL -- which, remember, is only operationalized in U.S....

...agree that the core problem here has little to do with the particular tool being used (drones or otherwise) and much more to do with the continued erosion of international legal regimes and the blurring of boundaries between law enforcement/human rights frameworks and IHL. Your discussion of DEVGRU’s reported involvement is especially striking, particularly given the unit’s history and the institutional patterns you identify. That said, I still find myself stuck at a more basic threshold issue in the legal analysis: there is no role for IHL in the first...

...of the identifiability provision is to avoid the confusion of who is/is not a combatant in the combat zone. It’s nonsensical to apply it to drone pilots operating thousands of miles away from the enemy." It does seem counterintuitive, but I think it does apply. For instance, we have private contractor drone operators in theatre...they need to have people actually over there to get the drones off the ground, but military pilots take them over to do the targeting. That wouldn't be necessary otherwise. Marko Milanovic Kevin, You raise an...

...make every effort to identify the target but it is not a war crime to defend yourself from an obvious threat even if it is subsequently determined that you used force against protected civilians. When President Clinton fired cruise missiles into Afghanistan in response to the attacks on the US Embassies in Africa, this was an example of strategic self defense because the US did not regard it as serious enough to trigger an armed conflict. Had drones been available at the time, he might have been able to order...