...14
lines of difference including ‘gender, sexuality, ‘race’/skin-colour, ethnicity, nation/state, class, culture, ability, age, sedentariness/origin, wealth, North–South, religion and stage of social development.’ Lutz’s list is neither exhaustive nor definitive but, importantly, she warns of the dangers of keeping a closed concept that risks neglecting the spaces between these
lines of difference. In my chapter, ‘De-essentializing Race: Intersectionality as a Feminist Approach in International Human Rights Law’, I argue that the conceptualisation of intersectionality should include as many multiply-burdened individuals as possible. As I show, if we fail to address...