Search: Symposium on the Functional Approach to the Law of Occupation

small step to raise the question whether it is not possible (or perhaps even more logical) to view these prima facie non-legal phenomena as law. A key element here may be the notion of ‘presumptive law’. This notion was developed by Prof. Jan Klabbers in his important publication ‘Law-making and Constitutionalism’ in his co-edited volume The Constitutionalization of International Law. In building his argument, Klabbers departs from the more or less pragmatic concept of law developed by Tamanaha: law is “whatever people recognize and treat as law through their social...

emerging economies. It is also interesting from the standpoint of treaty interpretation for at least three reasons. First, according to Article 23.3 of the Model: The governing law for interpretation of this Treaty by a tribunal constituted under this Article shall be: (a) this Treaty, (b) the general principles of public international law relating to the interpretation of treaties, including the presumption of consistency between international treaties to which the Parties are party, and (c) for matters relating to domestic law, the Law of the Host State. The reference to...

this is an area where China’s arch-sovereigntist approach could shift in the future; and Many Chinese international lawyers were deeply disappointed by China’s decision not to sign the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court and international criminal law is a fast developing sub-discipline of international law in China. To find out more, read the summaries of our roundtable meetings prepared in accordance with the Chatham House Rule: Chinese Approaches to Public International Law and the Rights of Individuals Chinese Approaches to Public International Law and the Rights of Individuals...

...determining whether the specific-direction requirement has a customary foundation, domestic law is irrelevant, because that law may rest on “differing values and principles.” That’s quite literally nonsense. And even worse, it’s nonsense designed to make defendants as easy to convict as possible. To be clear, I am not arguing that aiding and abetting under customary international law requires specific direction. I strongly doubt that it does. Still, it’s important to note, as the defence did, that one of the primary reasons you don’t find specific direction in national law is...

level, and then also to place their work in the framework of the modern laws governing war, both international and domestic. It is a return to first principles in order to see how events have shaped or discarded them. The fundamental principle I think they established is that in the absence of a statute, the laws governing the U.S. armed forces in war are the laws of war. I do believe several aspects of the MCA violate international law. You can read another article of mine regarding Article 5 status...

independent weight, for example, of how large and powerful states see the law. The fundamental problem of the “doctrine of sources” in the law of nations looms larger these days, not smaller. One of the effects of this is to raise uncertainties as to these most basic assumptions about the nature and authoritative sources of law – and that raises the costs of using international law as a means to try and settle things, because the fragmentation of authority means there is no “institutional settlement” by means of the law...

...been zionism’s constitutive aim. 2. A legal folk tale Many law students—though fewer with each passing year—believe that law is a useful instrument in the pursuit of liberation, or at least the lightening of oppression. While some governments speak the language of pure force, legal professionals counter this, their conscience merging with their craft to produce principles and safeguards that seek to restrain power and redress injustice. Some lawyers believe that law can contain violence, disciplining its harbingers and, sometimes, holding them to account for the harm they occasion. My...

Environment under International Law during Occupation: Join Westminster Law School and International Law at Westminster (ILaW) Research Group on 5 February 2025, 5.30 pm, in London, to discuss the new book by Dr Waad Abualrob on Protection of the Environment under International Law during Occupation  (Routledge 2024) with Dr Saeed Bagheri (University of Reading), Dr Meagan Wong (University of Essex), Dr Waad Abualrob (University of Westminster) and Dr Marco Longobardo (University of Westminster). More info and free registration are available here. Job Ad Astra Fellowship: The UCD Sutherland School of Law wishes to appoint...

balance scholarship, teaching, institutional service, and their role as public intellectuals. Being a “public intellectual” will grow in importance for law professors and law school deans. Law school deans will place a premium on faculty scholarship being widely read, and increasingly, traffic will be as important if not more important than placement in prestigious journals. The struggle to secure high Internet traffic (measured by paper downloads, traffic meters, etc.) will be the future bane of law professors’ existence. Law Professor Scholarship Law professors currently buy into a closed system of...

...international law either. Just as philosophers exclude white supremacy from their syllabi—we should say their cognition—so do scholars of international law vanish it from the discipline. In a standard international law course, racism only merits cursory mention in reference to the International Convention for the Elimination of Racial Discrimination and as evidence of the normative supremacy of human rights (see common article 2). The substitution of racism with racial discrimination is consistent with liberal race theory, reinforcing portrayals of the individual as both assailant and victim and stripping the phenomenon...

has not only a legal but a moral responsibility to obey just laws. Conversely, one has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws. I would agree with St. Augustine that “an unjust law is no law at all.” Now, what is the difference between the two? How does one determine whether a law is just or unjust? A just law is a man-made code that squares with the moral law or the law of God. An unjust law is a code that is out of harmony with the moral law....

Having already discussed the application of Security Council Resolution 1244, I will now turn to general principles of international law concerning secession and recognition. Thomas Franck, one of the five international law experts asked by the Canadian government to consider certain issues regarding a hypothesized secession of Quebec, wrote that: It cannot seriously be argued today that international law prohibits secession. It cannot seriously be denied that international law permits secession. There is a privilege of secession recognized in international law and the law imposes no duty on any people...