Search: Symposium on the Functional Approach to the Law of Occupation

...of nations" shifted to attention to customary international law. It would not be unusual to say that the laws of war include relevant portions of the law of nations or customary international law -- knowing that the laws of war also include relevant treaties or portions thereof. That, at least, was my point. Jordan To be more precise, one should not equate the 1942 use of "law of nations" with all of "international law." On another point, do the customary laws of war include more than "status, rights and duties"?...

this, law schools in Hong Kong should give more attention to researching on civil law systems and educating law students on the operation of civil law.   Differences between Common Law and Civil Law Common law and civil law are the products of two fundamentally different legal methods. In civil law, the main principles and rules are contained in codes and statutes, which are then enforced by the court. Case law is a secondary source of law while codes and statutory law prevail. The common law, on the other hand,...

in any way change the fact that Jessup is still by far the most prestigious and challenging International Law moot court competition in the world today. I've learned more in doing Jessup than I would have ever learned in an academic course or writing a seminar paper. From general international law (Art.38(1) sources, general principles, ICJ procedures etc.) to particular international law subject matters (the ever-complex and ever-expanding dynamic fields of public international law, namely IHL, IHRL, Responsibility, UN law etc.) Writing 20,000 word memorials in English on these topics,...

the schools that are either requiring a first-year transnational law course or are offering it as a first-year elective. Patrick S. O'Donnell Peggy, I apologize for not linking to your post as well. Non Liquet I work at a large law firm as an international lawyer so maybe I am not the best to speak about "regular" law, but let's work with an example that Posner provides. He writes: "Do not confuse public international law and private international law! Private international law, which essentially involves choice-of-law issues, could be useful...

of 1 justice ? THATS THE QUESTION. Please identify yourself, your official position, and your address. TonGuE-tWisTeD Response...The more you behave like that, the more fan email I get from fellow lawyers from the UP College of Law and lawyers of other schools. - Knack Can you name me one? Paula Defensor Knack Hiding again behind pseudonyms. The behavior of a coward. Give me your name, position, and address. Your pseudonym is not helping you, as a lawyer, prove your case. What does that say about your lawyering skills ?...

While called neutrality laws, because their main purpose is to carry out the obligations imposed upon the United States while occupying a position of neutrality toward belligerents, our laws were intended also to prevent offenses against friendly powers whether such powers should or should not be engaged in war or in attempting to suppress revolt. To quote Tucker, we must always distinguish between “the operation of the law of neutrality as determined by international law and the operation of municipal neutrality laws. The latter may be applied to situations other...

...common law (see Blackstone, as well as Bart's reference to malum in se), not the common law of war (see Lieber and Winthrop) which now must be thought of in terms of customary IHL (to account for the positive law movement). It is interesting how many folks are fond of "undemocratic" common law when it suits their needs, but decry it, international law, and customary international law when it doesn't. (This comment is not directed at you Bart.) This, though, gets to the issue of the different types of military...

...law regarding Hamdan or human rights law regarding Hamdan? Are we equating the laws of war with human rights law? I think there is a difference. They may go hand in hand, but I think the seperation is distinct. I would argue international law deals with the affairs of states and human rights law deals with, well, people. I would argue that two distinct threads would be needed to discuss Hamdan in terms or purely human rights issue and Hamdan in terms of purely international law. fdelondras Marko Oh yes,...

there is nothing wrong as a general matter with state law incorporating international law. Second, federal foreign affairs preemption is nonetheless in tension with the idea of state law having broader extraterritorial reach than federal law. And third, this tension basically disappears when the state law incorporating international law presents a “false conflict” of laws among the relevant jurisdictions’ laws. Here the fields of private international law and conflict of laws gain salience and supply a doctrinally and historically grounded mechanism for entertaining claims arising abroad in U.S. domestic courts....

suppression of natural law had already begun with the rise of the state system and the end of central authorities to oversee the law, in particular the prohibition of force. More pressure against natural law came with the rise of science and the emphasis on material proof that favored positive law theory over natural law. Positive law also suited European governments and the U.S. It freed them from the natural law principle that law is superior to sovereign states, as well as principles of universality, equality, and peace. In their...

law. This is the realm of natural law or, to use a relatively recent synonym, jus cogens. But, as Mary Ellen rightly notes in The Power and the Purpose, The classic problem associated with natural law is, Who decides? How do we avoid the natural law answer being the subjective opinion of any one person—scholar, judge, world leader? Contemporary natural law theorists have responded to this problem, especially through the concept of the common good as an objective answer for natural law principles. Mary Ellen, however, offers an additional explanation...

laws of war) -- but it is the international laws of war that are incorporated by reference--somewhat the same with the War Crimes Act (although some definitions and standards radically deviate from international law and should not be used). Jordan and the point should be made that what had been prosecuted since the Revolutionary War as violations of the laws of war prior to the existence of the first implementing statute (in 1916) was the international laws of war, not some peculiar U.S. "common law." Looking back in U.S. history,...