...resolutions as part of the “national interest” inquiry, but that related only indirectly and partially to international
law.) However, as indicated below, and unlike the international
law perspective, this runs the risk of offering an incomplete analysis even as to the domestic
law perspective. For those opining about both international
law and U.S. domestic
law, the ground is treacherous. The safer course, usually, is simply to assume for purposes of discussion that the legal constraints are independent and potentially sufficient. Thus, for example, John Bellinger (via
Lawfare) states that legality...
07.04.17
|
Edward Swaine
|