Search: Symposium on the Functional Approach to the Law of Occupation

...Congress could not make law to enforce a treaty that resolved a dispute between a state and a foreign country unless Congress could make the same law absent the international dispute. Between 1913 (the earlier case) and 1920 (Missouri v Holland), it became almost universally understood that migratory birds were not inexhaustible, and that overhunting by Missouri would be detrimental to the rights of other states. However, it turned out that only Canada was willing to contest Missouri's assertion of exclusive "property"ownership. When the property dispute is between a state...

...consulate simply because I had the presence of mind to hire a lawyer and refuse to make a statement to the police. And if incarcerated, I would want them to make their statutorily required prison visits to me as well! John Corbett Peggy, In this case, it appears that the defendant chose not to hire an attorney. Given that fact, the question then seems to become whether the defendant's failure to demand an attorney can be seen as the functional equivalent of a waiver of his/her right to contact and...

Here is another persuasive account of why the U.S. is disadvantaged by not joining the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea. The case is fairly simple: There is a lot of oil and natural gas up there, and the U.S. can’t negotiate with other countries to divvy it up until it signs on to UNCLOS. The 5.5 million-square-mile area north of the Arctic Circle — part of the U.S., Russia, Canada, Denmark (which owns Greenland), Finland, Norway, Iceland and Sweden — contains up to 25 percent of the...

[ William S. Dodge is Professor of Law and Associate Dean for Research at the University of California, Hastings College of the Law. From August 2011 to July 2012, he served as Counselor on International Law to the Legal Adviser at the U.S. Department of State, where he worked on the amicus brief of the United States to the Fourth Circuit in Yousuf v. Samantar. The views expressed here are his own and do not necessarily reflect the views of the State Department or of the United States.] In Yousuf...

...insofar as the approach sees the courts as agents of the domestic legal system, where “internationalists” see them as advancing the international order, as part of the global community of courts. I take the point, but the problem here is that everyone ultimately conceives themselves to be constitutionalist — in the sense of maintaining positions that are consistent with the Constitution —, even those who see federal courts as an entry point for the incorporation of international law. I don’t think the discursive high ground will be so easily captured....

...The question though is, what exactly is the flaw in the Obama policy? Is it not being tough enough on Sudan? Or is it being too tough? Kristof can’t seem to decide. His complaint seems to be that Obama is unengaged. (This seems to be a common complaint about Obama, and I think it is unfair. I am not an Obama supporter, but he does have a lot on this plate right now). In any event, I think we can all agree that the goal here is to prevent the...

receive. That can’t plausibly be an outcome we seek. Perhaps most troubling in this line of argument, Mr. Bellinger asserts that the bargain the Geneva Conventions strike may be summarized as follows: “Ignore the laws of war, and you cannot seek the status given to lawful combatants.” Because the Taliban violated the law of war, they are not entitled to the protection of the law of war. This is something like a circular argument. The Taliban no doubt committed war crimes; accordingly they should be prosecuted for these violations under...

...compared to now. I am wondering if when we are talking about ‘the prolonged implosion of governmental structures and the ensuring incapacity of the government to provide political goods to its internal and external constituencies’ we should speak in terms of levels of dysfunctionality of the state as opposed to failure. It focuses our attention on the functions that are not being met and the solutions to addressing those functional deficiencies. I sense with failed a "paternal' even "neo-colonialist" vision or weight to the words that is problematic. Best, Ben...

country—Tajikistan—provides for less involvement by a part of the legislature in treaty-making than in domestic lawmaking and makes the results of that process automatically a part of domestic law. To explain how the United States came to have such a haphazard and unusual system for making international law, I trace the history of the two tracks of international lawmaking back to the Founding. The current system rests on rules and patterns of practice developed in response to specific contingent events—events that for the most part have little or no continuing...

as organized crime or war crimes, so why not terrorism? The second set of issues relates to the differences in procedural and substantive law between these specialized courts and regular civilian courts. There would again be little or no problems under human rights law to have bench trials instead of jury trials, to limit the hearsay rule or the exclusionary rule, as long as sufficient fair-trial guarantees exist. But when it comes to detention and to my knowledge of international and European case-law, a regime of preventative detention, even if...