Search: Symposium on the Functional Approach to the Law of Occupation

and the Air Transport Association of America and Others v Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change, (Case C-366/10, 2011, paras 101-111) the European Union is bound by international law, including customary international law. However, to consider customary international law as a benchmark against which the lawfulness of EU acts can be reviewed, the rule should be binding on the European Union, with its content sufficiently precise. Nonetheless, in this case, the Court fails to apply international law since it does not seem to understand the distinction between the...

...the chief judge went today to explain why Saddam was sentenced to death was to say Saddam he found guilty of Article 12 A, through Article 15 B, of the Iraqi High Criminal Court Law… All that means, examining at the law, is that Saddam was guilty of “willful murder” because he had “ordered, solicited or induced the commission of such a crime, which in fact occurs or is attempted.” Saddam Hussein was found guilty of ordering murders. Who he murdered, how, when and what proved his guilt, we are...

...Instead, the doubters tend to be softhearted dupes. A tremulous liberal, who defends a Middle Eastern neighbor from vigilantism, is killed when the neighbor turns out to be a terrorist. When a civil-liberties-minded lawyer makes a high-toned argument to a Presidential aide against unwarranted detentions—“You continue to arrest innocent people, you’re giving the terrorists exactly what they want,” she says—the aide sarcastically responds, “Well! You’ve got the makings of a splendid law-review article here. I’ll pass it on to the President.” There is a lot more to the article, including...

[André de Hoogh is Associate Professor in International Law, University of Groningen. He is a member of the Advisory Committee on Public International Law , which provides advice to the Dutch government and parliament; this contribution has been written in his personal capacity, and does not reflect in any way the views of the Advisory Committee. His research covers a wide range of topics in public international law.] In the last couple of weeks, NATO, EU, heads of government and ministers of foreign affairs and defence have been repeating a...

[Charlie Martel is an adjunct professor at the American University Washington College of Law. His most recent article (available on SSRN here) examines the implications of Oslo and Road Map obligations on the legality of the Israeli security barrier, and was published last month at 17 Duke J. Comp. & Int’l Law 305] First, thanks to Roger for offering me a chance to share some thoughts on the Annapolis Declaration. To bloggers and blog readers, I ask that you please be gentle with me because this is my first post....

unable to agree on sanctions measures to address the situation in Gaza and the West Bank. International law demands intervention by the international community and time is running out to save the lives of civilians. When will measures in accordance with international law be taken? Sanctions in International law ‘Sanctions’ are not defined in international law nor does the term appear in the United Nations Charter. Measures adopted as sanctions can range from trade sanctions, arms embargoes, asset freezes and travel bans.  The diverse justifications and complex contexts in which...

held him (almost entirely) incommunicado, denied Red Cross access, and made unlawful demands upon Israel for his safe return. We might interpret those facts as merely establishing unlawful conditions of detention and a request for "exchange of prisoners," but it seems a lot more like hostage taking prohibited by international humanitarian law. I am uncertain whether a hostage can be converted to a POW by dropping the unlawful demands, but it's a good question. Kevin Jon Heller John, I don't think we disagree on the first or third points. i...

[Andrea Mensi is a postdoctoral researcher in public international law at the University of Lugano and adjunct professor at the University of Milan; he is an attorney at law admitted to the Milan Bar.] Introduction While the international community is still debating about whether to recognize a government led by the Taliban, there are further critical issues to consider, such as the management of the natural resources in Afghanistan and the rights of the Afghan people with respect to those resources. At the time of writing this post (30 September...

...investigated (emphasis mine): 32. The ICC case law has not authoritatively determined the meaning of the word “case” in Article 17(1). It is significant that for the purposes of authorising an investigation under Article 15 in respect of the Kenya Situation the Pre-Trial Chamber held that the admissibility of the case before the ICC must be determined by whether (i) the groups of persons that are the likely to be the object of an investigation by the ICC and (ii) the crimes that are likely to be the focus of...

...Congress could not make law to enforce a treaty that resolved a dispute between a state and a foreign country unless Congress could make the same law absent the international dispute. Between 1913 (the earlier case) and 1920 (Missouri v Holland), it became almost universally understood that migratory birds were not inexhaustible, and that overhunting by Missouri would be detrimental to the rights of other states. However, it turned out that only Canada was willing to contest Missouri's assertion of exclusive "property"ownership. When the property dispute is between a state...

...case does not even arise. That case dealt with the resolving the tension between an EU State's contradictory obligations under the UN Charter and under EU law. In essence, it considered the extent to which EU law would take cognizance of the State's having a contradictory obligation. Here, however, any obligation that would arise under a UNSC decision would be binding on one entity--States--while the potentially-contradictory Rome Statute would be binding on another--the Court. Thus, we have a situation where different subjects of international law would potentially have different obligations,...

individual liberty. That is why one of the first laws passed by Congress extended and standardized habeas by statute. We have not seen common law habeas (stripped of statutory extensions) since the country was founded, until it began to be exercised in the DC Circuit after Boumediene. It is therefore not surprising that it would be more controversial to initiate something that has existed but never actually been used since the founding of the Republic (common law habeas) than to simply interpret the text of a familiar statute to extend...