Search: Symposium on the Functional Approach to the Law of Occupation

has limits under contemporary international law. As Adil Haque puts it “Under the law of self-defense, even a legitimate aim must be set aside if it is outweighed by the harmful effects of the force necessary to achieve it.” As is well known to readers of this blog-site there are attempts to infuse the law of self-defence with old ideas from the law of neutrality. The suggestion is that, where a state is unwilling or unable to deal with threats emanating from its territory, the law of self-defence would allow...

...quick and successful removal of Saddam’s government would have sent the most powerful of messages to the other “rogue” nations: don’t even think of going nuclear. It was a logical game plan deeply rooted in our national security. The “failure” that I mentioned above occurred after the invasion was successfully completed. We had absolutely no idea how to go about pacifying Iraq. Our idiotic blunders of occupation were painfully evident as they were being committed, and I lack the incentive to try to recount them here. Suffice it to say...

Mihai Martoiu Ticu == But should the Court have accepted a request that so clearly sought to use a court of law, whose legitimacy depends on it being perceived to offer neutral advice, for the political purposes of some states to engage in what we now call "law-fare"?== Is that not what happens in all lawsuits? If I believe that Johny has stolen my wallet and I ask a judge to give me my wallet back, I use a court of law, whose legitimacy depends on it being perceived to...

is the external dimension of the obligation to ensure respect by other actors, its customary law status, and whether common Article 1 imposes any obligation on third parties. This external dimension has evolved over time. In its Wall Advisory Opinion, the ICJ emphasized that states, both occupying powers and third states, have a responsibility to ensure respect for Geneva Convention IV (ICJ’s Advisory Opinion on Wall (2004), para. 158) and ‘all the States parties to the Convention ‘are under an obligation, while respecting the United Nations Charter and international law,...

The letter of 4 March 2022 does not provide a legal justification for condemning the Russian Federation, nor the decision to exclude Russia from its participation in the Developed Countries Coordinating Group. WTO PANELS HAVE RESISTED CHARACTERIZING LEGAL EVENTS AS VIOLATIONS OF INTERNATIONAL LAW The 2019 Russia-Ukraine trade dispute, Russia-Measures Concerning Traffic in Transit dispute (the DS512 dispute) was the first dispute to formally analyse the invocation of Article XXI. Yet, this report offers more than an analytical framework for approaching the trading rule/security exception dichotomy. Less discussed than the...

...in its own internal arrangements, is entitled to the protection under international law of its territorial integrity. In other words, international law guarantees to every state its “territorial integrity” and it can’t be overridden by “self determination” unless serious freedoms or discrimination against residents in the seceding region are being infringed. Moreover, this right has generally only been exercised by states under colonization or foreign occupation. The right might also exist if the state is facing the threat of egregious human rights violations (e.g. Kosovo), but the right in even...

”Mr. Khalil, if you are going to leave the room, it will harm your client. The court will be obliged to appoint lawyers from the defense bureau.” Saddam: ”The court is allowing the witness to speak, but it does not allow the defense lawyers to defend. Is this the justice?” Judge: ”You will be heard.” Al-Dulaimi: ”We will not stop until we receive the full answer to the question we are concerned with.” Judge: ”We will give you enough time, regarding the refutation of the legitimacy of this court. This...

...in our conclusion, to consider what the Venezuelan situation means for democratic legitimacy as a criterion for the recognition of governments in international law. Democratic Legitimacy and Recognition In the past 25 years, there has been increased interest in the role of democratic legitimacy in the practice of recognition of governments and in particular whether, in addition to effectiveness, democratic legitimacy constitutes a distinct criterion for the legal recognition of governments. Cases like Haiti (1994) or Sierra Leone (1998) generated much controversy as a result of the fact that the...

...constructing a clear multilateral legal regime. International law can play an important role in this burgeoning field. Rather than attempting to ban such mining enterprises, international law can provide a framework so that such ventures can have greater certainty and better assess risks, as well as have certain limits on their activities. A multilateral agreement can recognize the property rights of companies extracting resources, define where resources can and cannot be extracted, define a regime of noninterference among mining ventures (there are broader noninterference norms in the existing OST and...

...I suggest that you read the most adavanced learned commentary on space law, the Cologne Commentary on Space law, edited by Stephan Hobe/Bernhard Schmidt-Tedd and Kai-Uwe Schrogl, Colgone 2011 and 2014 as well as 3rd volume forthcoming in 2015, particularly the commentary to article II of the Outer Space Treaty and the article 11 of the Moon Agreement commentary. Than you will see that the existing legal regime does indeed allow the exploitation of lunar resources. Best regards Stephan Hobe Professor of Air and Space Law University of Cologne, Germnany...

...Vietnam: They must see Americans as strange liberators. The Vietnamese people proclaimed their own independence in 1945 after a combined French and Japanese occupation, and before the Communist revolution in China. They were led by Ho Chi Minh. Even though they quoted the American Declaration of Independence in their own document of freedom, we refused to recognize them. Instead, we decided to support France in its reconquest of her former colony. Our government felt then that the Vietnamese people were not “ready” for independence, and we again fell victim to...

I don't know anything about these cases, so am curious how the arguments were made there and might be extended here. The NewStream Dream Given that immunities are a function of their functionality, i.e., they are derived from the interests they seek to protect, it would be hard to say that a lawyer from the DOJ would get treated differently than a lawyer at one of the NSAs. In other words, you can't distinguish Yoo's case without striking a serious blow agains the whole concept. One other point that is...