...they reviewed the basis of the prisoners’ detention on the merits.” The Boumediene majority correctly notes that whether the key cases’ holdings “were jurisdictional or based upon the courts’ ruling that the petitioners were detained un
lawfully as prisoners of war is unclear” (slip op. 17). Rather than attempt to answer a momentous question of U.S. constitutional
law based on an ambiguous and incomplete historical record, the Court today quite properly turns to other sources of constitutional meaning, namely text, structure, the Court’s precedent and
functional, consequential and prudential considerations. Well...