Search: Complementarity SAIF GADDAFI

...never implemented. Moreover, inclusion of actors from these Oblasts ought to extend to actors that favour unity and represent minorities, including Russian-speaking groups opposed to Russia’s role in the conflict or to regional autonomy.  Subnational governance arrangements in Ukraine ought to centre around strong decentralization at the municipal level—in complementarity to a ‘weaker’ asymmetrical arrangement at the regional level—to avoid further deepening divisions along regional lines, which would render any future unity-building more challenging and instead encourage other regions to demand similar levels of self-governance. Moreover, this approach would increase...

...reasons. As already noted, it demonstrates a model for enforcing international obligations on non-state legal persons. As such, the principles that it has developed are highly relevant to AGI enforcement. The ICC’s fundamental principle of complementarity, for example, could be readily embedded in AGI regulation enforcement, thereby avoiding the need to construct a jurisdiction regime from scratch. Likewise, AI scholars ought to review the sophisticated (and relatively demanding) cooperation arrangements outlined in Part 9 of the Rome Statute. Contraventions of an AI moratorium are likely to involve complex cross-border elements,...

...it seems that an integration of the Statute providing for universal jurisdiction is the closest to the spirit of the ICC and to the Principle of Complementarity (Article 1) on which the Court is based.  Alternatively, serious human rights violations, typically triggering the responsibility of a state rather than individuals, may come under the jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) or regional human rights courts. This jurisdiction can be established through the application of Universal Jurisdiction (UJ), by invoking the breach of erga omnes obligations. There has been...

...and strengthens the principle of complementarity. There are legal gaps that this treaty fills, and it is important that we understand the context of these negotiations as well as the outcome. I was privileged to speak at the opening ceremony of the Diplomatic Conference on 15 May, and I highlighted the value of the MLA Treaty: firstly, as an additional tool in the toolbox to tackle impunity; second, its value towards greater international cooperation, globally as well as regionally; third, its relevance to Asia; and last, but not the least,...

...separation of the responsibilities of natural and legal persons. Contrary to the French proposal (art 23(5) and (6)) to the Rome Statute that was never integrated, the introduction of this provision would contain several advantages. First, it leaves the States satisfied with retaining control over the criminal prosecution of natural persons in accordance with the principle of complementarity. It is worth noting that, to this day, only two corporate directors have ever been prosecuted for their involvement in international war crimes: Guus Kouwenhoven and Van Anraat. Furthermore, this formulation recognizes...

...course, the other thing that has emerged from the war, is that the EU can talk about strategic autonomy forever and ever — NATO is the security ‘gateman.’ And what we need to see is a strengthening of the European pillar in NATO, a complementarity between the EU and NATO, cooperation and not rivalry. But the idea of an independent European security strategy — I don’t buy it. Now, of course, that can change depending on who sits in the White House. Because, of course, the big question is the...

...jurisdiction under the complementarity regime; and • hearings to review and monitor Court performance in order to identify means by which the United States can support the Court consistent with the interests of the United States and the international community and to re-examine whether the U.S. should become a party to the Rome Statute with any appropriate understandings and declarations as other States Parties have done. The Task Force, chaired by Will Taft and Patricia Wald, includes an august group of former jurists, notably Sandra Day O’Connor and Stephen Schwebel,...

...the case forward in the name of their national.  However, as the ILC’s 2006 commentaries Arts. 14 and 15 provide, the exhaustion of local remedies, and as such, individuals must go through national processes first, unless an exception applies (ie, domestic remedies are ineffective, inadequate, unavailable). Similar to the principle of complementarity in international criminal law, exhaustion of local remedies is meant to give deference to the place where the dispute arises, on the basis that it is often most efficient to resolve disputes where they occur, and this is...

...Statute. These include duties vis-à-vis States Parties which, if it had not withdrawn, would have otherwise arisen for the State in question on account of the Court’s exercise of its complementary jurisdiction in respect of the crimes over which that State would normally exercise jurisdiction. The ‘legal situation’ in connection with the Court’s exercise of jurisdiction encompasses, among others, the State Party’s duties to submit oneself to the ICC’s scrutiny as part of the complementarity analysis and to its admissibility determinations, as well as the duty to accept any prospective...

...persons unless the Pre-Trial Chamber, on the application of the Prosecutor, decides to authorize the investigation. Notice the logical and temporal structure of Art. 18(2). The provision is triggered whenever a notified state asks the OTP to defer its investigation on complementarity grounds. When the OTP receives such a request, the default position is that the OTP “shall defer” to the state’s request. The only way the OTP can avoid deferring is to ask the PTC to authorize the investigation. If the PTC grants the OTP’s request, the investigation can...

...Kay and Joshua Kern offered a detailed analysis of the OTP’s recent report on the preliminary examination of the Situation in Palestine, with a particular focus on the complex relationship between domestic civil litigation and the principle of complementarity. Carlos Lopez and Sonia Ost wrapped up the week with an in-depth discussion of the UNCHR’s recent report on oil companies’ complicity in gross human rights abuses in the South Sudan. While the duo supported the UNCHR’s recommendation for the creation of a monitoring body to ensure the equitable sharing of...

...principle of complementarity has always been active especially between international human rights and international humanitarian law in armed conflict. In the contest of nuclear security vis-à-vis an active armed conflict. Nuclear security should be ensured in times of peace and war. The attack of a nuclear facility in Ukraine by Russia does not negate or eliminate the already existing obligation of the nuclear security regime to ensure protection of nuclear facilities. The amendment to the Convention of Physical Protection of Nuclear Material article 2A(1c) prohibits any sabotage to any nuclear...