Search: Complementarity SAIF GADDAFI

...comes to gathering evidence, selection of suspects and conducting fair trials, to avoid duplication and wasting resources. In addition, an investigation by the Dutch national authorities will most likely block any investigation by the ICC by virtue of the latter’s complementarity to national courts of its States Parties. According to this principle, states are primarily responsible for investigating and prosecuting international crimes. The ICC only intervenes if states parties to the Rome Statute of the ICC are unable or unwilling to prosecute individuals’ suspected/accused of the most serious crimes of...

...was established – based partly on the model of standalone international courts for the Balkans and Rwanda – to serve as a permanent international court that could try individuals (much like domestic courts), for international crimes in The Hague. The underlying basis for this court is complementarity, which means that only once domestic remedies are exhausted can an international case be commenced. Again, like the ICJ, states typically need to have signed up to the treaty, the Rome Statute. In the case of the Rohingya, while Myanmar is not a party...

...my “What Is an International Crime? (A Revisionist History)” article — that will be in print very soon. I have nothing but good things to say about working with the journal. Not surprisingly given the caliber of the students, the journal provides excellent feedback that will make your article better. And if you’re particularly fortunate, HILJ will organise an online symposium about your article. They solicited responses to my “A Sentence-Based Theory of Complementarity” article from Carsten Stahn and Darryl Robinson. And Mia Swart, Astrid Reisinger Coracini, and Alejandro Chehtman...

...within its armed forces. Second, under the “complementarity” regime in Article 17 of the Rome Statute, the ICC is a court of last resort. Consequently, any country can avoid ICC proceedings by conducting its own investigations and – if warranted – prosecutions. Rather than trying to obstruct the work of the ICC, the U.S. should commit to thoroughly investigating and, where justified, prosecuting cases related to torture, thereby precluding such cases from appearing on the ICC’s docket. Third, U.S. efforts to obstruct the work of the ICC have backfired in...

...the independent and impartial exercise of my mandate under the Rome Statute, with full respect for the principle of complementarity. There is simply no substantive difference between the two statements. Both remind the parties that the Court has jurisdiction over the situation in Palestine. Both mention the possibility of specific crimes being or about to be committed. Both mention the Prosecutor’s concern at at that possibility. Both make clear that the OTP will investigate crimes committed in Palestine when appropriate. Both are, in short, preventive statements. There is, however, a...

Jobs The Asia Justice Coalition is pleased to announce two vacancies. The Asia Justice Coalition (AJC) is a network of organizations whose purpose is to promote justice and accountability for gross violations of international human rights law and serious violations of international humanitarian law in Asia, and to contribute to the fulfillment of the rights of victims and their families. Working together based on foundational principles of collaboration, complementarity, independence and transparency, the members of the coalition include Amnesty International, Asia Justice and Rights, Burmese Rohingya Organisation UK, Centre for...

...But the cost may be too great. The lack of safety valves and checks and balances in the Spanish system is problematic. As is the Spanish statute’s disregard for the principle of complementarity – there is no statutory mechanism in place to halt a case when territorial courts have in good faith launched their own investigation or initiated their own prosecution (although there is admittedly a Spanish Constitutional Court ruling to that effect, Spain’s seeming disregard of an Israeli investigation into the Gaza case gives pause). And nothing in the...

The Harvard International Law Journal is pleased to announce its third online symposium with Opinio Juris. The symposium will begin tomorrow, Monday, January 23 and will run until Thursday, January 26. It features the following line-up: On Monday, Mark Tushnet will respond to David Landau‘s article, The Reality of Social Rights Enforcement. On Tuesday, Darryl Robinson and Carsten Stahn will respond to Kevin Jon Heller’s article, A Sentence-Based Theory of Complementarity. On Wednesday, Carlos Vazquez will respond to David L. Sloss‘ article, Executing Foster v. Neilson: The Two-Step Approach to...

...Statute. These include duties vis-à-vis States Parties which, if it had not withdrawn, would have otherwise arisen for the State in question on account of the Court’s exercise of its complementary jurisdiction in respect of the crimes over which that State would normally exercise jurisdiction. The ‘legal situation’ in connection with the Court’s exercise of jurisdiction encompasses, among others, the State Party’s duties to submit oneself to the ICC’s scrutiny as part of the complementarity analysis and to its admissibility determinations, as well as the duty to accept any prospective...

...numbers.” Sara Mardini after talking to an immigration officer Complementarity of refugee law with international human rights law is compulsory in the case of the life project, at least under the present legal system. Let us recall that one of James Hathaway’s strongest arguments is that the 1951 Refugee Convention, a child of its days and still the primary source of refugee-specific rights in international law, has an underlying structure for the entitlement of those rights that is hierarchical and discriminatory due to a distinction between citizens and non-citizens, physically...

...African states as victims of a rigged international system. As an IR scholar, I appreciate that the book departs from the premise that international justice is ‘inherently and inextricably political’. By taking power seriously, Ba makes a significant contribution to our understanding of the motivations of states in their interactions with the ICC. He advances the well-rehearsed theoretical arguments on topics including complementarity, heads-of-state immunity and state compliance with international law by using empirical evidence from a plethora of case studies to test how the theory works in practice. Reading...

...contributions based on an abstract (max 500 words) that should be sent by 20 December 2023. Abstracts should be submitted with a short bio to lisa.heschl@uni-graz.at. The deadline for submitting the manuscript is end of March 2024. For further information or questions, please email lisa.heschl@uni-graz.at. The ICC as a Justice Hub, Pragmatic Complementarity and Domestic ICL Enforcement: Tilburg Law School, Department of Criminal Law, organizes an international conference on domestic prosecution of international crimes in light of the ICC’s shift from “Apex court to Justice Hub”.The conference will be held...