[Doug Cassel is Professor of Law at Notre Dame Law School]
Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez on April 30 directed his Council of State (a policy advisory body) to study Venezuela’s “withdrawal” from the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights. He asked for their recommendation within days, not weeks. This is the latest move in the Bolivarian Republic’s long record of denouncing the Commission and the Inter-American Court of Human Rights as tools of US imperialism, supposedly biased against socialist Venezuela.
But the real reason for Chavez’ pronouncement, say human rights groups – in my view correctly – is that the Commission and Court hold the Chavista regime accountable for its systematic violations of the independence of the judiciary (
1,
2), and of freedom of the press, (
3,
4), as well as other serious violations of human rights (
5,
6).
Chavez’ call was promptly cheered by other high officials in Caracas. It seems a foregone conclusion that the Council will recommend withdrawal. Since Chavez has already declared that Venezuela should have withdrawn a long time ago, he is all but certain to heed such a recommendation.
Withdrawing from the Commission, however, is not so simple.
