A quick follow-up to Chris' post below - this started as a comment, but got too long, so I'm putting here as a general comment. The question is one that many of us have asked from the outside, why the CIA in the conduct of drone operations? And the implied broader questions, is it legal and anyway why is it a good policy idea, even if it is legal, for the CIA to be engaged directly in use of force operations? The comment that follows is not attempting to defend a position; I'm just repeating in summary form what I've been told over the last few years by people here in Washington when I've asked these questions. Take them for what they are worth; I'm not an insider to government and have no access to anything secret of any kind. (Also, I would love to know Bobby Chesney's answers to the same questions, as an side inquiry to his project examining the legal issues in the merger of Title 10 and Title 50 operations - even just an informal comment on this would be useful.) It goes on for a while, so I'll put it below the fold.