The Obama Administration’s Overblown Internal Debate Over War on Terrorism Policy

by Julian Ku

Fascinating inside baseball piece on the Obama Administration’s internal debate over war on terrorism policy. It features a struggle between the State Department (Harold Koh) and the Defense Department (Jeh Johnson) with the OLC (David Barron) playing referee.

The rift has been most pronounced between top lawyers in the State Department and the Pentagon, though it has also involved conflicts among career Justice Department lawyers and political appointees throughout the national security agencies.

The discussions, which shaped classified court briefs filed this month, have centered on how broadly to define the types of terrorism suspects who may be detained without trials as wartime prisoners. The outcome of the yearlong debate could reverberate through national security policies, ranging from the number of people the United States ultimately detains to decisions about who may be lawfully selected for killing using drones.

I actually think the article overstates the differences somewhat.  All the key players agree there is a war against Al Qaeda and that there is a power to detain and try Al Qaeda folks. The only question  dividing them seems to be how to define a member of Al Qaeda, or supporter of Al Qaeda.  Admittedly, this is a difficult question but it doesn’t seem to be a deep philosophical divide.

http://opiniojuris.org/2010/03/29/the-obama-administrations-internal-debate-over-war-on-terrorism-policy/

2 Responses

  1. I thought the more salient difference was between those who want to make use of precedents and arguments bottomed on Bush-style claims of commander-in-chief power, in order simply to win their cases, as against those who aren’t as comfortable bowing to tactical litigation necessities and sacrificing the idea that Obama would walk back some of Bush’s more extreme claims.

    Which makes the headline, “Obama Team Is Divided on Tactics Against Terrorism,” make more sense.

    The divide is tactical, rather than philosophical.

Trackbacks and Pingbacks

  1. [...] appears this consideration is the subject of much debate across State and DoD.  See for instance Julian Ku’s post over at Opinio Juris and this article in the New York [...]