Sarah Cleveland Defends the “Obama-Clinton” Approach to International Law
by Julian Ku
I had the good fortune of participating in a symposium last week sponsored by the University of Virginia Law School’s John Bassett Moore Society. Entitled “The Obama Impact”, the symposium explored the impact of the new administration on international law and policy. I have already shared my views on this subject here and I took the opportunity during my visit to rebut the United Nations’ claim to “indispensability.” But the main action at the symposium was the keynote address by Sarah Cleveland, Counselor on International Law in the U.S. State Department’s Office of the Legal Adviser. Cleveland, who is also a Columbia Law School professor, offered one of the most forthright and clear explanations of the new administration’s approach to international law. A summary can be found here, along with a recording of her address. But below is a key excerpt:
“I would say that the administration has articulated an Obama-Clinton doctrine, a vision that reflects commitments to four elements,” Cleveland said. “The first is multilateral engagement. This was a consistent theme of the president’s campaign and has been a consistent theme of his first year in office.”
Other elements of the doctrine are universality, or the idea that all men are created equal, and the legitimating force of law, which suggests that law gives strength and legitimacy to government action.
“Finally, these goals are to be achieved through a principled pragmatism and the exercise of smart power: the intelligent use of all means to our disposal, including diplomacy, promotion of democracy, development and human rights,” Cleveland said.
Cleveland’s framework is interesting, but I’ll note simply that few of the things she describes are substantially different from things that Condi Rice and John Bellinger would have said. The devil is in the details, and so far there is not as much a difference as some of the campaign rhetoric suggested. (Not that this is a bad thing).
Related Posts
- May 17, 2011 -- Why Has DSK Not Yet Asserted Immunity? Because He Can’t.
- April 9, 2010 -- Will CEDAW Bring A “Radical Transformation of American Law”?
- March 29, 2010 -- The Obama Administration’s Overblown Internal Debate Over War on Terrorism Policy
- March 27, 2010 -- If Harold Koh Says It, It Must Be True: The U.S. Is At War with Al Qaeda
- March 4, 2010 -- The Obama Administration Will Oppose a Global Blasphemy Law (I Hope)
- February 19, 2010 -- The “Obama-Clinton” Policy on Treaty Submissions
- February 11, 2010 -- Experts Release Report Explaining that International Law Can Help Suppress Piracy
- February 6, 2010 -- Are President Obama’s Assassinations of U.S. Citizens Constitutional?
- December 19, 2009 -- Sleepless in Copenhagen
- November 23, 2009 -- Ruth Wedgwood on Former Diplomats with Financial (Conflicts of?) Interest
- November 16, 2009 -- Responsibility of International Organizations – The Problem of Attribution
- July 23, 2009 -- John Bellinger Gets it Right on Consular Convention Implementing Legislation
- June 24, 2009 -- Koh Update: Cloture Motion Passes [UPDATED]
- June 23, 2009 -- Legal Adviser Nominee Harold Koh Should Be Confirmed
- June 23, 2009 -- Remember Harold Koh? Full Senate Expected to Vote on His Nomination on Wednesday
- April 29, 2009 -- Posts on Koh Confirmation Hearing at Intlaw Grrls
- April 27, 2009 -- Defending Harold Koh
- April 21, 2009 -- Slye on Koh
- April 13, 2009 -- Catherine Powell at HuffPo on Koh and Customary International Law
- April 8, 2009 -- O’Connell’s “Who’s Afraid of International Law?” and the Koh Nomination
- April 8, 2009 -- Response to Ed Whelan Regarding Koh Nomination
- April 7, 2009 -- State Department Legal Adviser Nominee Harold Hongju Koh Holds Mainstream Legal Views
- April 6, 2009 -- Eric Posner on the Koh Nomination
- April 2, 2009 -- Koh State Department Nomination Update and Anupam Chander Guest Post
- March 31, 2009 -- Pro Koh [UPDATED]
- October 20, 2008 -- John Bellinger Reflects on Four Years as Legal Adviser at State
- January 26, 2007 -- Sincere Appreciations to John Bellinger
- January 26, 2007 -- Bidding John Bellinger Adieu
- January 25, 2007 -- Wrap Up Discussion II
- January 25, 2007 -- Separation of Powers and Troop Build-Up in Iraq
- January 23, 2007 -- A Response from the Human Rights Community
- January 20, 2007 -- Wrap Up Discussion I
- January 19, 2007 -- The President’s Constitutional Authority over International Law: Some Further Thoughts
- January 19, 2007 -- Illegal Combatants and Counter-terrorism — A Middle Way
- January 19, 2007 -- More Guest Blogging By Bellinger
- January 19, 2007 -- The President and the Interpretation of International Law– A Reply to Ku
- January 19, 2007 -- Counterterrorism Going Forward
- January 18, 2007 -- Judicial Review and the War on Terror
- January 18, 2007 -- Immunities and the Development of International Law
- January 18, 2007 -- Immunities
- January 18, 2007 -- Can the President Change the Laws of War?
- January 17, 2007 -- Unprivileged Belligerents (Or Illegal Combatants)
- January 17, 2007 -- Some Questions About Unlawful Combatants
- January 17, 2007 -- The Bargain Theory of War
- January 17, 2007 -- Unlawful Enemy Combatants
- January 16, 2007 -- Armed Conflict With Al Qaida: A Response
- January 16, 2007 -- The State Department and the War on Terror – Another View
- January 16, 2007 -- The Role of the State Department: Response to Posner
- January 16, 2007 -- The State Department and the War on Terror
- January 16, 2007 -- The Meaning of Common Article Three
- January 15, 2007 -- Armed Conflict With Al Qaida: A Reply
- January 15, 2007 -- Armed Conflict With Al Qaeda: A Riposte
- January 15, 2007 -- Armed Conflict With Al Qaida?
- January 15, 2007 -- The Work of the Office of the Legal Adviser
- January 11, 2007 -- Opinio Juris Welcomes State Department Legal Adviser John Bellinger
February 18th, 2010 - 12:03 AM EDT | Trackback Link |
http://opiniojuris.org/2010/02/18/sarah-cleveland-defends-the-obama-clinton-approach-to-international-law/
[...] conversation ranged across a wide variety of issues, including something that Julian Ku noted over at Opinio Juris blog (where I’m cross-posting) with respect to DOS international law counsellor Sarah Cleveland’s [...]