Does the U.S. Believe Hate Speech is Protected Under International Law?

Does the U.S. Believe Hate Speech is Protected Under International Law?

Anne Bayefsky of the Hudson Institute suggests that the U.S. is endorsing a less than robust view of the right to free expression in a recent Human Rights Council resolution sponsored by the U.S. (along with Egypt).  The resolution does appear to give an unusual amount of lip service to the combatting racism and discrimination (given its topic), but it seems pretty anodyne and harmless to me. Based on my reading, it doesn’t seem to depart too much (if at all) from current U.S. First Amendment law on free speech with its emphasis on the ability to restrict incitement to violence.  But someone more knowledgeable about this can correct me.  And it is ominous that folks are reading the resolution to endorse the “defamation against religion” cases that are big in Europe.

I sense the U.S. is basically looking for something non-controversial to say that would allow it to look like it was doing something positive at the Human Rights Council meeting (without actually doing anything substantive). I hope it succeeded.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Topics
General
Notify of
Martin Holterman

There was a major post by (first amendment specialist) Eugene Volokh on the Volokh Conspiracy dealing with this resolution, and another one by OJ blogger Kenneth Anderson. They were both pretty critical, though I did my best to defend the resolution to the extent appropriate.

Connecticut Lawyer
Connecticut Lawyer

Why in the world would anyone want the US to apppear to be making a positive contribution to the UNHRC?  Why shouldn’t the US just withdraw – it’s far worse by any measure than its predecessor.