Eugene Kontorovich Comments on Universal Jurisdiction Prosecutions by National Courts

Eugene Kontorovich Comments on Universal Jurisdiction Prosecutions by National Courts

Eugene Kontorovich, well known to OJ readers for his work on piracy and universal jurisdiction (both separately and together), has a very interesting post partly responding to discussion here at OJ on universal jurisdiction and proposed legislation on Spain on universal jurisdiction.  It is up over at Prawfsblawg and is a fun, quick read.  Also, here is Eric Posner’s comment, at Volokh: “It is becoming clear that governments are happy enough to enact universal jurisdiction statutes so as to make a show of keeping their treaty obligations—just as long as they don’t have to use them.”  I’m not sure that’s completely true – as I suggested in the earlier universal jurisdiction discussion, a lot depends on what the costs are to using the universal jurisdiction statutes – the US has not moved to impose serious costs in the case of Spain and although I have some anecdotal suggestions from friends in Spain that fear of China’s long term reaction, no matter how mild the official reation today, was enough to provoke a serious re-think by Spanish politicians, it is hard to say with any definiteness.  Of course, that is Eric’s larger point – countries weigh up the costs and benefits.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Topics
General
Notify of
Charles Gittings

… we need to prosecute … under our own laws. (Ed. by KA; as I said, no personal attacks, invective, uncivil comments.)

Will
Will

Why is prosecution for torture considered a politicised matter whilst piracy is neutral? It seems the only criteria for suggesting that is that the Republicans have got entangled in serious violations of peremptory norms, like those against torture, more so than the Democrats. But the correct response should be it is completely neutral if you think the Democrats should be prosecuted too even if that means fewer prosecutions on their side as it would.

It just seems like an extraordinarily  politically loaded judgement to make, even if you accept that Spanish prosecutors have an agenda entailing selective application of universal jurisdiction.