This is a non-substance post just to say thanks from all of us to Richard Gardiner and all the commenters for offering, and to Duncan for organizing, the treaty interpretation symposium this past week.  It was marvelously intellectual and subtle and, even having read the book, I am still reading the posts carefully.  I think they will be read and cited for a long time in the academic literature, and I am certainly pleased to say that they are up on Opinio Juris.

Related Posts

• March 4, 2009 -- The Abiding Relevance of Treaty Interpretation
• March 4, 2009 -- Beyond the Vienna Rules
• March 4, 2009 -- The VCLT and the New Haven School
• March 3, 2009 -- Art and Rules
• March 3, 2009 -- The Invisible College
• March 3, 2009 -- The Function of Principles of Treaty Interpretation
• March 3, 2009 -- Art and Auto-Interpretation of Treaties
• March 2, 2009 -- Textuality and Preparatory Work
• March 2, 2009 -- Interpretation as the Continuation of Politics by Other Means
• March 2, 2009 -- Treaty Interpretation and Preparatory Work
• March 2, 2009 -- Article 31 of the VCLT and ‘textualism’
• March 2, 2009 -- New Haven School, Textuality and Dynamic Interpretation
• March 2, 2009 -- Treaty Interpretation: Reviewing the Rules
• March 2, 2009 -- OUP/OJ Book Club, Richard Gardiner’s Treaty Interpretation