Back to Ken on Administrative Detention
by Deborah Pearlstein
Thanks Ken. Let me try to clarify again. On one level, you’re quite right: many human rights advocates believe a new system of administrative detention – beyond the criminal law and beyond the Geneva regime – is not a good idea as a matter of policy. (I hasten to add many who are not human rights advocates think a new administrative detention regime is a bad idea as well.) Objecting to such a new regime on policy grounds is, of course, different from asserting that it is categorically prohibited as a matter of international human rights law. Now I hardly wish to defend, explain or criticize Professor Scheinin’s particular remarks; among other things, I wasn’t at the 2007 discussion you mention and haven’t seen a transcript. The relevant paragraph of the report you reprint on this question is almost entirely limited to the Guantanamo detainees. And where it is not (as I read it, only in the last sentence of the second paragraph), it seems to be taking a position on the applicability of existing international humanitarian law (the law of armed conflict). On that question – whether there is an ongoing armed conflict in Afghanistan – I’ll have to respectfully disagree. I believe there is. As you point out, not even the ICRC is likely to dissent here. As for the no doubt considered views of our friends at HRW, HRF, ACLU, and beyond, we’ll have to trust them as always to speak for themselves.
Related Posts
- May 2, 2011 -- Guantanamo Interrogations Reportedly Led to Bin Laden
- June 21, 2010 -- The Gitmo Task Force Report
- February 11, 2010 -- Welcome to the U.N.’s “Bantanamo”
- August 20, 2009 -- Trying to Remember Why We’re Closing Gitmo?
- July 29, 2009 -- Military Commissions Moving Ahead
- July 21, 2009 -- Delayed Detention Policy and the Big “Ifs”
- July 9, 2009 -- Post-Acquittal Detention
- June 30, 2009 -- More from the Detention Front
- February 25, 2009 -- Rashomon at Gitmo
- February 18, 2009 -- Constitutional Right, No Gitmo Remedy
- January 13, 2009 -- Talk About Travel Perks
- January 11, 2009 -- Gitmo Policy Under the New Administration, Cont.
- December 16, 2008 -- Scholars’ Statement on U.S. Detention Policy
- December 12, 2008 -- David Cole on Detention in the Boston Review, and Joanne Mariner, Robert Chesney and Eric Posner Respond
- December 5, 2008 -- Jonathan Adler Raises Questions About Key Democrat Views on Interrogation Techniques
- November 28, 2008 -- Professor Martin Scheinin Responds to Ken re Administrative Detention
- November 26, 2008 -- Try or Release
- November 26, 2008 -- Ken’s Question on Administrative Detention and Human Rights
- November 15, 2008 -- The Preventive Detention Debate Under the Democrats
- November 11, 2008 -- Rumors of Gitmo’s Demise
- November 4, 2008 -- So Much Advice, So Many Advisors
- October 28, 2008 -- Gitmo Cases Move Ahead in the Courts
November 27th, 2008 - 4:46 AM EDT | Trackback Link |
http://opiniojuris.org/2008/11/27/back-to-ken-on-administrative-detention/