Search: unwilling or unable

...ISIS the financial resources to continue its military campaign. This is a consequentialist calculation. The problem is that it is not so good for the individual hostage. European governments care about the lives of the hostages and are willing to save them, even though they know that saving them will make the overall situation worse, both for the global community as well as their own citizens will inevitably be taken hostage again. But they are unwilling to balance away the interests of the hostage for some larger societal interest. This...

...treaty power. To be sure, because they disposed of the case on other grounds, it is impossible to say what the Justices in the majority, particularly Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Kennedy, would do if the Court were to consider another case raising such a challenge to the scope of Article II. It is fair to infer, however, that they would be unwilling to go down that path. Bond presented what will probably prove to be the most favorable context in which to establish such a new doctrine, for the...

...the Kyoto Protocol could still be a deal-killer. Developing countries have said they are unwilling to accept anything in Cancun under the Framework Convention track unless developed countries accept a second commitment period under the Kyoto Protocol. The Kyoto Protocol’s structure is a bonanza for developing countries, since it exempts them from any emission reduction commitments. So, not surprisingly, they are adamant that it must be preserved. For the same reasons, some developed countries – most notably, Japan – are equally adamant that the Kyoto Protocol approach should be scrapped...

...policies regarding religious practices are having on Turkey. “[C]ritics of the policy–and there are many on campuses here–say that a law supposedly designed to protect the country from religious intolerance and move Turkey into the modern era has had the opposite effect. Human-rights experts estimate that hundreds of Turkish women unwilling to adapt to the law in their home country have left in order to complete their education elsewhere–in Europe, in the United States, or in other countries that allow them to wear Islamic dress. Others have abandoned higher education...

...warrant a softening of proportionality. So far, the Court has been unwilling to offer any such example. In 2010, in the case of Cepeda v. Colombia, the Court addressed the political assassination of an opposition Senator by two sergeants of the Colombian Army who received copious prison benefits, ultimately reducing their 43 year sentence to 11 and 12 years respectively. The Court established that “[u]nder the rule of proportionality, in the exercise of their obligation to prosecute such serious violations, States must ensure that the sentences imposed and their execution...

It is sad to see that Professor Heller, like HRW’s employees, is unwilling to acknowledge any HRW misteps. It is even sadder to see that Professor Heller, like HRW’s employees and other supporters, is willing to distort the facts in order to excuse HRW’s and Kenneth Roth’s inexcusable behavior. (a) Contrary to Professor Heller’s contention, HRW’s philosophy has never been that “that state-sanctioned killing of any kind is never justified.” If it were, HRW would not pretend to adhere to the mission of upholding the laws of war, since the...

...unproductive during that time. Faculty seemed unwilling to take the simplest of steps to approve the use of our money to improve their facilities (for example, even the building of bookshelves), absent approval from superiors, which could weeks to arrive. (We gave up and simply started telling everyone that we had approval for everything we sought to do from George Bush himself, which seemed to work, even if we were not a government agency, a further demonstration of strong socialist bias). And most importantly, and actually most understandably, a populace...

...able and willing to protect human rights against those and other actors, that could make sense. In practice, many states are much less powerful than those actors. In practice, quite some states may be able, but are unwilling, to reign in those powerful non-state actors. Universal Design So how should human rights law be redrawn? Sticking to the language of architecture and design, universal design (design for all) should guide any redraw: human rights law must work to the greatest extent possible for all, in all situations. It should therefore...

...an unwilling democratic majority. But that is simply a red herring. After all, academics and NGOs have no power to create law on their own. They can only make arguments that it would be in the best interest of the United States to follow certain international norms. And to whom do they make such arguments? Well, to the extent that the arguments are made to the legislative or executive branches, then clearly the international law argument is not subverting the democratic political process; it is part of that process. Therefore...

...or serious violations of international humanitarian law which sovereign Governments have proved powerless or unwilling to prevent. (Para. 203.) In other words, the Panel does not claim that the use of force for humanitarian purposes is legal in the absence of either Security Council authorization or conditions that trigger the inherent right to strike in self-defense. Rather, the Panel’s evident intention is to suggest that the Security Council should ipso facto consider mass atrocities against civilians to be a threat to international peace and security, thus triggering its power to...

...North Korea sought political asylum in … China?) and perhaps a lot more shooting using Russian commandos, say, while the Americans watch from their unmanned surveillance vehicles, unwilling to get involved in the messiness unless able to deal with it via stand-off Predators and Hellfire missiles, while the Europeans primly quote, not Security Council resolutions authorizing action against piracy, but … ECJ decisions asserting that Security Council resolutions are not actually the last word on international peace and security? Should the United States think that a good long term outcome?...

...covering crimes against humanity and war crimes respectively, the scenario it depicts could actually result in an ICC prosecution. That said, the film does make two errors — one blatant, one subtle. The blatant error is that it refers to the “Special Prosecutor” of the ICC. The subtle error (minor spoiler alert!) is that it implies that an unwilling witness could be required to testify, when the ICC lacks subpoena power. On the bright side, the “Special Prosecutor” in the film is a woman. We all know that would be...