Search: unwilling or unable

...of the IHT, I doubt it would be unwilling to pressure the Cassation judges to sit on their review of Saddam’s death sentence through at least the end of the Anfal trial.) If the government believes that executing Saddam will quell the insurgency, I think it is mistaken — if anything, the violence will spike in the short-term and then return to the same level as before. The insurgency is about the U.S. occupation and the Iraqi government’s resolute political and economic marginalization of the Sunnis, not about some wistful...

...tax liens, obviously made-to-order. Over time it became clear that, even politically connected as we were at the time, and well funded, etc., we could not really prevent a takeover by a local government that was identical to the local mob in a provincial Russian city out towards Siberia. (Sound familiar? See this excellent Washington Post story by Philip P. Pan today.) We were lucky and managed to sell our stake to a Norwegian company that probably simply paid the necessary bribes we were unwilling to pay and probably did...

...and this third prong will continue to be controversial in the coming years as we face the specter of a nuclear Iran. There will continue to be threats that do not pose imminent harm–such that traditional international law self-defense justifications are triggered–but nonetheless present grave threats to national security. With news that China and Russia are presently unwilling to even recommend the question of Iran’s nuclear development for referral to the Security Council, we are poised in the coming year for another international crisis without Security Council supervision. The United...

...of the defendants to select counsel they trust, the tribunals’ reliance on over-classification practices, use of evidence obtained through coercion despite the statutory ban on doing so, and lack of equal access to witnesses and flawed discovery processes that collectively undermine the ability of defendants to mount credible defenses. The use of substandard tribunals to try aliens which we are wholly unwilling to submit our own nationals to is entirely unprecedented in the history of U.S. military justice and provides the potential basis for an equal protection challenge. If reviewing...

...realm of international relations. In this context, one may consider the question: Are states deemed “recognised” due to their “civilised” status, or are they considered “civilised” primarily because they are the entities granting recognition?  The “cat meows”. It is, indeed, alive. However, the “observers”, predominantly powerful states and institutions, choose to disregard this reality, as acknowledging it would require embracing a truth that they are unwilling to accept. Statehood, akin to civilisation, transforms into a performative privilege reserved for those already encompassed within a certain “elite” circle.  For others, no...

...states’ public record of cyber activities appears consistent with international law. If properly scoped, such a function would help align how states apply and interpret international law in cyberspace, while also introducing a degree of peer accountability. Of course, it is unrealistic to expect that a review proposal along these lines would be adopted without significant resistance, particularly given that many, if not most, states would be unwilling to subject themselves to mandatory review. Any such function would therefore need to be introduced initially on an opt-in basis. Moreover, key...

...perhaps the former being more relevant. ‘Unwillingness’, explained further in Article 17(2) means sham trials to shield perpetrators, unjust delays, or lack of independence or impartiality (Otto Triffterer and Kai Ambos explain that this list is exhaustive). The case in question, i.e. not prosecuting based on legitimate ijtihad, does not appear to fall under any of the ‘unwillingness’ options. We must be clear that such a decision is not an act of shielding persons from proper justice processes. At this point, it appears simple: complementary may be fulfilled.  However, there...

...general). It is simply not the same to speak about “detention centers” than to speak of “concentration camps”. Calling past or ongoing atrocities what they are is an important first step for a society to act on said atrocities. As Heidi Matthews points out with regard to the Canadian MMIWG Report, “[t]hinking about Canada’s past and present through the lens of Indigenous genocide questions the foundations of Canadian sovereignty in a way that, until now, the Canadian people and its government have been unwilling to do”. This is a good...

...are immigrants; many are people of color. Unlike in Black Widow, very few are babies, and even fewer are kidnapped from their mothers’ unwilling arms. Where Does It Occur? Human trafficking happens in every country. Most countries have imposed domestic trafficking laws; however, there is a dearth of both enforcement and understanding in how the crime operates. A common misconception is that trafficking must involve a border. As above, human trafficking occurs when a trafficker uses force, fraud, or coercion to compel another person into work or into engagement in...

...performance, unforeseen developments, and competing priorities. At the same time, developing countries are seeking to replace or reform existing donor-dominated multilateral institutions, in favor of new structures that give them significant decision-making power over cost sharing, conditionality, and disbursement and use of funds. Developed countries, on the other hand, are rightly unwilling to commit funds without mechanisms to ensure adequate financial controls and assurances of positive environmental outcomes. Although Mexico and Norway (among others) have very recently re-proposed a single global fund to collect and disperse all climate-related finance, such...

...judicial review. The basis for this deeply held belief is the seat that I had at the counterterrorism table. That is, I have been a direct participant (not witness) to extraordinarily complicated dilemmas and understand the tension between excess of power and limits of power. That tension and the need to respond justifies active judicial review. The legislative branch –as historically documented–is incapable/unwilling to restrain the executive (in any country, including the U.S. and Israel); the only operational response to Justice Jackson’s ‘unfettered executive’ concern is an active, interventionist Court....

...thus losing Democratic support, whereas President Clinton had been more willing to includes such labor provisions. I certainly welcome any commenters who can correct me, but my impression was that both administrations have been unwilling to include very strict, enforceable labor rights provisions in trade agreements. The leading Clinton-era labor-trade provision, I believe, is the NAALC (North American Agreement for Labor Cooperation) side agreement to NAFTA. My impression is that NAALC has been relatively dormant and I don’t quite see how it is different, substantively, from a variety of labor...