Search: Affective Justice: Book Symposium: A Response

with.] This year marks 15 years since Sri Lanka’s brutal decades-long civil war ended. There are credible allegations all sides to the conflict committed serious human rights and international humanitarian law (IHL) violations, including incidents of sexual violence, torture, extrajudicial killings and enforced disappearances. The victims/survivors of these violations still await justice. Sri Lanka attempted to grapple with the past through transitional justice (TJ) processes, but these have largely failed. In the absence of meaningful accountability efforts in Sri Lanka, the international community has stepped in to a limited extent...

for and the enforcement of international justice”. The term “international justice” surely cannot mean justice only where the accused is shielded from guilt. Unfortunately, it means precisely that — as I show in my article criticizing the DPT. In fact, “bring the person to justice” does not “echo” the reference to “international justice” at all — save for the fact that the word “justice” is in both expressions. “Bring to justice” actually has a very specific meaning in the context of Art. 17(2)(c): namely, to convict. I don’t blame Al-Senussi’s...

[Antonia Mulvey is the Executive Director of Legal Action Worldwide (LAW).] As the world marks the 5th Rohingya Genocide Remembrance Day on the 25th of August, it is Rohingya women who are playing a leading role in the fight for international justice. They are ‘Champions of Justice’ – a remarkable group of women who are tearing up the gender norms of Rohingya patriarchal society. Most of them are survivors of brutal violence perpetrated during the 2016 and 2017 “clearance operations”. They are joined by a growing list of countries voicing...

recourse for victims of heinous crimes committed overseas, offering them a path to justice that may otherwise be inaccessible. In the wake of the current global atrocities, the TVPA exemplifies how domestic laws can effectively embody international legal standards, serving as a vital link between disparate legal systems. The TVPA’s integration into international law discourse is far from theoretical; it represents a tangible effort to ensure that survivors of international offenses are empowered with a voice and a means to seek justice. As such, the TVPA could serve as an...

...they are committed — applies to his acts and thus justifies punishing him (“justice can be helped to triumph by the proper application of this penal law”). That does not make the authors of the amicus brief Nazis. But it does mean that the amicus brief is relying on the same kind of analogical reasoning that was at the heart of the Nazis’ perversion of the German criminal-justice system — the same kind of analogical reasoning that was specifically condemned as itself criminal by American judges in the Justice case....

Prize Cases and Presidential Order establishing the Military Commissions are similar examples. What is disheartening in all four is that while the executive engaged in excess neither the Congress nor Supreme Court engaged or challenged the President. Checks and balances fell by the wayside; Justice Jackson’s famous warning of an ‘unfettered executive’ went unheeded. As the three branches of government move into the post Bush era they would do well to recall not only Justice Jackson’s words but also those of the former President (Chief Justice) of the Israeli Supreme...

[Margaret V. Sachs is the Robert Cotten Alston Professor of Law at the University of Georgia School of Law and an expert on securities law] The Supreme Court yesterday issued its decision in Morrison v. National Australia Bank, its first ever on the international reach of Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5. Justice Scalia wrote for the Court, with additional opinions by Justice Breyer (concurring in part and concurring in the judgment) and Justice Stevens, joined by Justice Ginsberg (concurring in the judgment). Justice Sotomayor did not participate. The federal securities...

[Richard Dicker, formerly director of the Human Rights Watch International Justice Program, is now a senior adviser with the organization and teaches at Columbia and UCLA law schools. Alina Pucko, a German lawyer, is a candidate for a Masters of Law degree at Columbia Law School.] With Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and revelations of apparent war crimes and possible crimes against humanity, attention has turned in an unprecedented way to criminal accountability as a necessary response to the brutal international crimes occurring there. The visible expression of this accountability surge...

the Panel of Experts.  attempt to circumvent or corrupt the administration of justice must be properly addressed. “Offences Against the Administration of Justice” It is quite clear that these are matters that fall within the jurisdiction of the ICC under Article 70 of the Rome Statute. Any person who has attempted to obstruct the independent investigations of the Prosecutor may be guilty of “offence against the administration of justice” under these provisions. As Karim Khan himself said when announcing the request for the issuance of arrest warrants “if we do...

[Dinah PoKempner is General Counsel of Human Rights Watch. She is writing in her personal capacity. Views expressed in this essay are not necessarily those of HRW.] Increasing judicial recognition of a duty to investigate and even to prosecute serious violations of international law is unlikely to narrow the ambit of transitional justice; to the contrary, it adds pressure for more thorough transitional measures by upping the reputational cost of impunity. Not even two decades have passed since agreement of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, arguably a...

Have you worked on post-conflict justice issues? Have you been part of a rule of law project in a conflict zone? If so, you may be of help to our colleague Professor Elena Baylis (Univ. of Pittsburgh), who is working on a really terrific empirical project on post-conflict justice. Here is the information from Elena which includes eligibility to win a $100 to spend at Amazon.com: If you have ever worked in the field of post-conflict justice, including work on post-conflict rule of law and/or work on post-conflict accountability for...

Justice O’Connor’s views on international law and foreign law are moderate, well-reasoned, and consistent. Julian points out two quotes and implies that, somehow, they don’t fit together in a “[]satisfying” world view. I disagree. On topics of international law, Justice O’Connor has consistently held that U.S. judges should, in certain instances, give persuasive authority to international tribunals. It is also her view that they do not have to do so as no international or foreign tribunal has been given judicial authority by the Constitution. It is not necessarily a view...