Search: Affective Justice: Book Symposium: A Response
30 Jun Statement Against US Sanctions on ICC Investigations (Updated)
...Adjunct Professor of Law, Columbia Law School David Kader, Emeritus Professor of Law, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona Daniel Kanstroom, Professor of Law, Thomas F. Carney Distinguished Scholar, Faculty Director, Rappaport Center for Law and Public Policy, Co-director, Center for Human Rights and International Justice, Boston College Law School Zachary D. Kaufman, Associate Professor of Law and Political Science, University of Houston Law Center David Kaye, Clinical Professor of Law, and Director, International Justice Clinic, University of California, Irvine School of Law Patrick Keenan, Professor of Law, University of Illinois...18 Oct Guest Post: SCOTUS Oral Argument in Daimler v. Bauman
...counsel asserted that MBUSA “acts independently” of Daimler. Justice Sotomayor responded: “It seems an odd thing to say given the page and a half that the lower court went through on the various ways in which Germany controls this subsidiary. It appoints all its officers. It approves all its operating procedures. It approves all of the people it hires and fires. It seems like there isn’t much left for what….” As further proof that it was not the plaintiffs’ day, Justice Sotomayor was then interrupted by Chief Justice Roberts. While...25 Mar Medellin and the Perversion of Legal Realism
...Medellin. In this regard, it is helpful to recall Justice Iredell’s opinion in Ware v. Hylton, 3 U.S. 199 (1796). In Ware, Justice Iredell distinguished between executed and executory treaty provisions. Treaty provisions are “executed” if “from the nature of them, they require no further act to be done.” Id. at 272. In contrast, executory treaty provisions require some further action by the U.S. government. Justice Iredell divided executory treaty provisions into three groups: legislative, executive, and judicial. See id. at 272-73. Whether an executory treaty provision requires legislative, executive,...
11 Oct Delays, Interference, and Espionage: The ICC’s Struggle with Arrest Warrants in the Situation in the State of Palestine
deliver justice impartially. Every day of delay undermines this responsibility and casts doubt on the Court’s capacity to act without fear or favour. This moment presents the ICC with a unique opportunity to demonstrate that it can stand firm in the face of political pressure and deliver justice to victims without discrimination. But to do so, it must reaffirm its commitment to impartiality, transparency, and the rule of law. The Chamber’s response to these external forces will not only shape the outcome of this investigation but could ultimately define the...
08 Jun The Kosovo Specialist Chambers: In Need of Local Legitimacy
[Andrea Trigoso is a qualified lawyer with an LLM and experience in International Criminal Justice. She is currently pursuing a MAS in Transitional Justice.] The notification of the Prosecutor of intent to initiate proceedings in February this year renewed hopes of the international community in the Kosovo Specialist Chambers (KSC), mainly because after almost five years of the commencement of its work, very little progress has been achieved in the investigations and prosecution of the cases. However, the Kosovar population does not necessarily share the enthusiasm with the international community,...12 Jun A Second Take on Boumediene: Habeas Corpus and Military Commissions
...with which you disagree? Justice Kennedy Should Be Impeached You can't say, though, that they don't have a right to habeas corpus because the scheme is accurate and/or fair. That's a non-sequitur. Apparently, someone didn't read Chief Justice Roberts' opinion, which notes: The Court’s second criterion for an adequate substitute is the “power to order the conditional release of an individual unlawfully detained.” Ante, at 50. As the Court basically admits, the DTA can be read to permit the D. C. Circuit to order release in light of our traditional...
12 Apr Symposium on Dominic Ongwen Case: Navigating the Complexities of Reparations for Victims of Northern Uganda
[Margaret Ajok is currently the Transitional Justice Advisor at the Governance and Security Programme Secretariat (formerly JLOS), at the Ministry of Justice and Constitutional Affairs, Uganda. She is a lawyer and advocate of the Courts of Judicature of Uganda and is also a task force member for the African Union Women for Transitional Justice Network representing Africa.] Introduction The over two decades war in Northern Uganda between the Lord’s Resistance Army (LRA) and the Government of Uganda led to horrendous and deplorable acts of violence. The affected communities suffered enslavement,...
26 Nov The Time is Urgent While the Discrimination Continues: CEDAW As the Last Avenue of Justice for the Malaya Lolas?
...crime of sexual enslavement during WWII, the Communication argues that the Philippines’ response, or lack thereof, has been contrary to its obligations under the CEDAW Convention since 2003 – the year in which the Philippines ratified the CEDAW Optional Protocol. But before pointing to specific violations. under the Convention, it is necessary to locate the Philippines’ response to the Malaya Lolas’ demands within a historical context of gender-based discrimination, exemplified in the de-prioritization of the female wartime slavery survivors’ claims. This first became apparent during the negotiations and drafting of...
24 Apr Vedanta v. Lungowe Symposium: A Non Conveniens Revival–The Supreme Court’s Approach to Jurisdiction in Vedanta
...the self-same test (at [88]). The Supreme Court went on to say: “The question whether there is a real risk that substantial justice will be unobtainable is generally treated as separate and distinct from the balancing of the connecting factors which lies at the heart of the issue as to proper place, but that is more because it calls for a separate and careful analysis of distinctly different evidence than because it is an inherently different question. If there is a real risk of the denial of substantial justice in...
25 Nov ‘Lock Them Up and Throw Away the Key!’: Another Step in the ICC’s Pathway toward Retributivism
...a clear signal to would-be perpetrators that justice ultimately prevails”. But can we really say that “justice prevails” when a person is sentenced to long-term imprisonment? Although there is no doubt that mass atrocities must be condemned and prevented, the idea that harsh punishment best serves the purpose of addressing these crimes is more controversial. As several academics have noted, in the last few decades criminal punishment has gradually become the decisive instrument for responding to practices of oppression and violence, as well as for promoting justice and peace. The...