Search: Affective Justice: Book Symposium: A Response
25 Jul AJIL Symposium: Benvenisti response to Klabbers, McCrudden, Von Bogdandy and Schmalz
[Eyal Benvenisti is the Anny and Paul Yanowicz Professor of Human Rights at Tel Aviv University Faculty of Law and Global Visiting Professor at New York University School of Law.] I am grateful for the three incisive and insightful comments. Due to space limitations I will not be able to do justice to any of the comments in this response, but they will certainly help in my future work on this subject. I will use this brief response to clarify some parts of my argument and to situate the article...
19 May Pandemic of Hunger Symposium: Reflections on UNSC 2417 – A Preventative Tool, an Accountability Response, or Both?
...accountability response and can it be both? We conclude here that it can, and indeed, should be both. This issue will be discussed further in GRC’S expert webinar on 19 May. Given the array of conflict settings where food is being weaponised against the civilian population, UNSC 2417 faces a test as to its agility and efficacy (see GRC’s piece related to this on Tigray and Alex de Waal’s damming account here). Scope and purpose of UNSC 2417 The resolution creates a mechanism for UNSC action on the issue of...03 Dec A Response to Milanovic: The Lure of Extraterritoriality
Austen Parrish is a Professor of Law and the Vice Dean at Southwestern Law School. I’m grateful to Opinio Juris for inviting me to comment on Marko Milanovic’s book on the Extraterritorial Application of Human Rights Treaties. The book makes a meaningful contribution to an increasingly important issue of treaty interpretation, and the book’s sweeping treatment of how different courts and entities have addressed whether treaty-based human rights obligations apply beyond borders deserves praise. Few authors have provided this sort of detailed doctrinal description, and none to this degree of...04 Dec On the Legitimacy of the Settlements: A Legal and Historical Perspective
...points of view might be quoted. Speaking in front of the Peel Commission in 1937, Winston Churchill made it clear for instance that there was nothing in the definition of the “National Home” that might have precluded “the establishment of a Jewish State.” (Palestine Royal Commission: Command Paper 5479 of 1937.) As noted by Isaiah Friedman in his British Pan-Arab Policy, 1915-1922: “Whether [the first British High Commissioner for Palestine Herbert] Samuel had this ultimate aim in mind when conceiving his policy is dubious. But Churchill, as his response of...11 Feb Formation of Human Rights Treaties, A Response to Alex Geisinger
I have addressed treaty formation in the book. To that question I would answer “sort of.” As the last paragraph in my response to Roger indicates, the book does explore some of the relevant issues, but not all of them. There is much more to be said on this issue, and it strikes me as important for our understanding of international law and international relations. And if someone has a good explanation for why states sign human rights treaties, I invite them let me know and we can co-author the...03 Jan Dershowitz on Israel and Proportionality
...authority of a neighboring territory, what would you consider a "proportionate" military response, morally, legally, or both? Marko Milanovic If I may venture to offer a response to Prof. Bernstein's question on human shields: Art. 28 of the Fourth Geneva Convention provides that "The presence of a protected person may not be used to render certain points or areas immune from military operations." Art. 51(7) of Additional Protocol I further provides that "The presence or movements of the civilian population or individual civilians shall not be used to render certain...
01 May Can Coastal States Interrupt Foreign Passage in Their Territorial Seas in Response to Non-Compliance with Human Rights Obligations? A Response to the ASCOMARE Legal Opinion
...passage in foreign territorial seas. At the end, I present an alternative justification under which coastal States may interrupt foreign passage in the territorial sea as a response to non-compliance with human rights obligations, notably where international crimes are concerned. Brief Highlights of the Opinion The question of interest concerns whether coastal States may interrupt the passage of a foreign vessel through their territorial sea “in response to non-compliance with international human rights obligations binding upon those States, including obligations under the UN [2014] Arms Trade Treaty and other relevant...16 Jan Armed Conflict With Al Qaida: A Response
...the United States asserted response in self-defense over the past five plus years to the attack of 9/11 and other attacks attributed to Al Qaeda? Was the war in Iraq a proportional response and why? Were the secret prisons a proportional response and why? Were the extraordinary renditions to nations known by State to torture a proportional response and why? What are the legal limits on the United States or any states' reaction to an attack by a non-state actor? Does anything go? Can we round up 100 civilians to...10 Dec Transitional Justice and Judicial Activism Symposium: Comments by Chandra Lekha Sriram
[Chandra Lekha Sriram, Professor of International Law and International Relations and Director, Centre on Human Rights in Conflict, University of East London.] This insightful article covers a great deal of subject matter, far more than can be analysed in a brief comment. These include not only the topics signaled by the title, but also the relationship between transitional justice and international criminal accountability and between transitional justice and the jurisprudence of regional courts. The primary focus of the article is the jurisprudence of regional courts, specifically the European Court of...
01 Sep Symposium on Myanmar and International Indifference: Support for Lawyers in Myanmar Remains Paramount Since the Coup
[Raquel Saavedra is an International Legal Adviser, Myanmar, for the International Commission of Jurists. Kingsley Abbott is the Director of Global Accountability and International Justice, International Commission of Jurists.] In recent conversations with diplomats covering Myanmar, we continue to be asked: is it still worthwhile for states to support the work of Myanmar lawyers when the justice system is in a state of collapse? The answer is yes. Not only is it worthwhile to continue to support independent lawyers during a time of crisis, it is also critical for there...