Search: Affective Justice: Book Symposium: A Response

John Yoo could be held liable for the legal advice he gave the Bush administration — an issue for which the primary, and perhaps only, precedent remains the prosecution of Nazi lawyers in the Justice and High Command cases. I hope that my book will, in some small part, help resolve such difficult legal questions. I have always received extremely helpful feedback on the law-review articles I have mentioned on the blog. I hope the same will prove true for the book. The complete proposal can be downloaded directly here....

[Samantha Besson is a Professor of Public International Law and European Law, University of Fribourg and Fellow of the Wissenschaftskolleg zu Berlin] I would like to start by thanking Dov Jacobs and the Leiden Journal of International Law for organizing this on-line symposium on my extraterritoriality piece, and, of course, for agreeing to publish the article in the first place. Many thanks also to Professor Marko Milanovic and Professor Cedric Ryngaert for their generous comments and not least for taking the time to deliver them at this busy time of...

We are grateful for the praise and the criticisms of our book from distinguished scholars like Sungjoon Cho, Rebecca Bratspies, and Tomer Broude. We are particularly pleased that all three appreciated our efforts to engage in an interdisciplinary and multi-level analysis, to do empirical justice to the complexities of the GMO dispute, and to identify the broader implications of the case for the study of international law and politics. We address three issues in particular that deserve a response: our biases in the US/EU dispute; the question of how the...

...its job for fear of being seen as “soft on terror”. To hell with those critiques on the left or the right! Hooray for American Justice! A great leader of an international criminal tribunal once told me that the test of his tribunal had been not in its convictions of horrendous perpetrators but in its acquittals. Justice Robert Jackson emphasized in 1945 that for judicial norms and judicial forms to be present, a defendant has to be able to prove his innocence in the procedure. That is precisely what happened...

...question to you would be - Assuming transitional justice hinges on society addressing its conflict and other related issues, how would it handle the wider cold war aspects that potentially draw the West into the fray? Manuel Ventura So let me get this straight.. if only transitional justice had been implemented, Russia would not have gone into the Ukraine today...? Or did I miss something? Ilya Nuzov Joshua, since Russia failed to institute transitional justice measures, as I explained in my post, the current political elite has no interest in...

...18 U.S.C. § 1503, inter alia, as using “any threatening letter or communication, influences, obstructs, or impedes, or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede the due administration of justice.” And the California statute (Penal Code § 182(5)) is similar, prohibiting conspiracy “to commit any act injurious to the public health, to public morals or to pervert or obstruct justice, or the due administration of the laws.” But do such criminal penalties apply to international arbitration? It seems that arbitration could easily fall within the general definition of administration of justice,...

...these two inquiries. Chief Justice Burger, dissenting: I agree generally with Mr. Justice Harlan … but I am not prepared to reach the merits. I should add that I am in general agreement with much of what Mr. Justice White has expressed with respect to penal sanctions concerning communications or retention of document or information relating to the national defense. Justice Blackmun, dissenting: I join Mr. Harlan in his dissent. I also am in substantial accord with much that Mr. Justice White says, by way of admonition, in the latter...

Julian Davis Mortenson Hi Ulf – Thanks so much for these thoughtful comments. I’ll offer thoughts about your principal points in my official 1,000-word response when it runs. But I was quite intrigued by one thing that I won’t have space to address in the formal response, so I thought I’d follow up on it here in the comments. You say that the VCLT “confirm[s]” that “the legally correct meaning of a treaty” is defined by “the communicative intention of the treaty parties.” My first reaction was -- “Boy, that’s...

I read my friend Andrew Guzman’s book Overheated: The Human Cost of Climate Change with great interest because I know Guzman is exceedingly capable at communicating complex ideas in an accessible format. He’s done that throughout his career, and Overheated is no exception. Like Hari Osofsky, I commend the book to our readers. Before you teach the law of climate change, give your students the facts by assigning portions of this book. The science behind climate change is one of those issues that is beyond the comprehension of most intelligent...

John Knox Two thoughts. First, the search nearly always starts with Google, but it doesn't end there -- if a searcher finds references to your book, won't he or she then be able to obtain the book itself easily? Second, are you safe in assuming that the book won't be completely searchable online within the next few years? Either way, I don't think books are going to be obsolete in the near future. Devon Whittle Why not just publish a book but also distribute it as an eBook? Roger Alford...

...Seoul, and we hope insights from this symposium can shape our understandings in advance of this important meeting and others like it.  The symposium kicks off with a pragmatic reflection on ‘A Risk Framework for AI-Enabled Military Systems’ by Lieutenant General (Ret.) Jack Shanahan, who builds on his extensive military experience to suggest a five-tier risk hierarchy for developing and employing AI in military contexts. The second post from Rebecca Crootof shares her insights and experience with the U.S. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), explaining the inner workings, current...

Opinio Juris, in collaboration with Rachel Jones, who some of you will recognize as the person behind NYU’s Institute for International Law and Justice Twitter handle (@nyuiilj), is happy to host what we believe to be the first symposium on “International Law & Pop Culture” in the IL blogosphere. Fittingly, this symposium would not have been possible without the existence of social media and Twitter, where the initial idea was hatched, half joking, half serious, several months ago. Upon Rachel’s initiative, and believing in the potential of the topic, we...