Search: Affective Justice: Book Symposium: A Response
10 Jan Israel’s Shifting Defense of Its Attack on the UN School (Updated Again)
books nor is there any reason whatsoever to conclude that they are "one-sided." Such a judgment could only come from someone who has not taken the time to read the books in question. That is to say, don't just read the lists, but read the works that make up the lists. Patrick S. O'Donnell I've left an extended comment/post but it appears to have been eaten (this has happened before and it later appears so perhaps it will this time as well; if it does, it just means I didn't...03 Aug Opinio Juris Symposium: Additional Thoughts on the President’s Military Response Power
order a counterattack. What possible reason would there be for such a gap? John D. Professor Ramsey, I will first admit that I have not yet read your book but do plan to add it to my library. I have been reading these posts with great interest. Thanks to opiniojuris for this symposium. On this issue, however, I believe Professor Kent has the better argument. I understand you, Professor Ramsey, to be saying that the president can order any and all military responses, to include attacking on the enemy's soil...
07 Dec Advancing Human Rights in Pandemic Treaty Debates
...health emergency and pandemic prevention, preparedness and response. Find more information here or here. This is a pivotal moment in the global governance response to future pandemic threats, with crucial global health law reforms being undertaken through the World Health Organization (WHO) to “draft and negotiate a convention, agreement or other international instrument on pandemic preparedness and response.” To be developed by the World Health Assembly of WHO Member States, this so-called “Pandemic Treaty” provides a crucial opportunity to advance human rights in global health governance, responding to human rights...
18 May Getting Ready for Next Time: The Work of the Independent Panel for Pandemic Preparedness and Response
On 19 January 2021, the Independent Panel for Pandemic Preparedness and Response (the “Panel”) presented to the WHO Executive Board its “Second Progress Report”, which is its first substantive report on its inquiry into the international response to the COVID-19 pandemic. While the Panel’s inquiry is still under way, it has submitted the Second Progress Report as an interim report consistent with its commitment to “work in an open and transparent fashion”. This post provides some observations on the Panel’s findings as well as its working methodology as reflected in...
16 Jun Is an Ineffective State Response to COVID-19 a Violation of Human Rights?
24; see also Poblete Vilches v. Chile). These human rights create a landscape in which States’ accountability for their response to COVID-19 can be adjudged upon. Ineffective State responses to the COVID-19 pandemic might not ostensibly go against international or regional human rights standards. However, when reviewed, violations of human rights become apparent. A common response by States that were ineffective in controlling the pandemic was a delayed response. The failure to act, especially when legally obligated to take measures to control and treat epidemics is a violation of Article...17 Jul Questions About the Gacaca Courts in Rwanda
...this sentence. The defendants in No. 4 Category will not be sentenced. If no agreement can be reached on the return of stolen or destroyed goods, the Chair of the cell’s Gacaca jurisdiction will decide on the damages to be paid. The new Gacaca system is based on a participatory justice system and on its reconciliatory virtues. According to the Justice Ministry, the population that was in the hills at the time of the genocide will be “witness, judge and plaintiff.” It is worth noting that PRI’s statement about defendants...
10 Jul Climate Justice in an Unequal World: A Chat with Professor Richard Falk, Ecocide’s Legal (Grand)Father
[Dr. Luigi Daniele is a Senior Lecturer at Nottingham Law School, NTU.] This interview is being cross-posted by Opinio Juris, the Nottingham Law School Climate Justice Hub , and the Queen Mary School of Law Centre for Climate Crime and Justice. I had the great honor and special pleasure of discussing ecocide and climate justice with Professor Richard Falk, Albert G. Milbank Emeritus Professor of International Law and Practice at Princeton University, Chair of Global Law and Co-director of the Centre for Climate Crime and Justice at Queen Mary University...
12 Dec Why Individual Integrity Matters
integrity standards, how awareness of integrity can be raised, and what contributes to reinforcing an integrity mindset in staff and a culture of integrity in the agency in question” (page 40). Another recent publication, edited by Morten Bergsmo, Mark Klamberg, Kjersti Lohne and Christopher B. Mahony, Power in International Criminal Justice, further contributes to concretising what could be termed as an ‘integrity turn’ in international justice. In his introductory chapter, Bergsmo describes how a sociology of international criminal justice, unmasking power structures and informal social networks which may weaken institutional...
18 Apr Symposium on Confronting Colonial Objects: Charting a Cultural Relational Justice – Unraveling the Complexity of Human Remains Restitution in the Democratic Republic of Congo
into account the needs articulated by the community? In this post, I will first examine the legal frames and challenges governing the restitution of human remains. I will pay particular attention to the case of the Wamba community, which calls into question conventional inter-state methodologies. I will then explore the potential of relational justice to mitigate dilemmas. 2. Moving Beyond the Interstate Approach: Towards Cultural Relational Justice The legal frameworks governing the restitution of human remains are sometimes complex and ambiguous. Among these texts, the 1970 Convention on the Prohibition...
16 Dec Justice as Message Symposium: Expressivism as Bridging Theory
I I like the argumentive rigour of analytic philosophers, and I share the ideologicalsensitivities of most critical scholarship. But they largely appear as two different projects, studying different aspects of the elephant. Enter Carsten’s book on expressive theory. Carsten’s expressivist approach engages in open-minded inquiry into normativejustifications (hence he draws on Hegel, Duff and others). But he is equally curious about biases, shortcomings, and exclusions. If justice is a message, then what is the message, whose message is it, who transmits it, and to whom? Justice-as-message offers a framework that...