Search: Affective Justice: Book Symposium: A Response

In a recent post at EJIL: Talk! on the India/Pakistan crisis, Mary Ellen O’Connell references a book chapter in which she suggests that Israel’s 1976 raid on Entebbe was the first situation in which a state invoked the “unwilling or unable” doctrine as a jus ad bellum justification for self-defense: Christian Tams, Dire Tladi, and I will soon publish, Self-Defence Against Non-State Actors, edited by Anne Peters and Christian Marxsen (Cambridge University Press, July 2019). We have spent the last several years analyzing the law relevant to the very sort...

in a single volume. This book does quite well at that - my chapter aside, I'm afraid. But the vast majority of edited books, I find, are simply articles that do not share enough in common to justify binding them together in a single volume, and selling the whole volume. Cherry picking is fine, but very costly given the price of books. In the vast majority of cases, I'd find it more efficient to post the papers online at a website hosted by the editors, and then put the papers...

...students will be able to publish articles before going on the job market in the third year, that will not be the case for a book. I’d add that the bias will be even greater, because American legal academia does not value books anywhere near as highly as legal academia in the rest of the world — a reflection, I think, of the ridiculous length of American law-review articles. I think that’s a shame, because writing a book was by far the greatest academic and intellectual experience of my life....

...this point, believes that an armed attack by an NSA cannot give rise to the right of self-defense. I certainly don't, and nothing I have ever written indicates otherwise. The question is whether, to qualify as an "armed attack" within the meaning of Art. 51, an NSA's armed attack must be in some sense attributable to a state. As literally dozens of books and articles make clear (I've pointed you to a book by Tom Ruys and an article by Christian Tams), the traditional customary position prior to 9/11, established...

the terms of those treaties. Article 9 of the constitution itself allowed the Rada, a political organ, the discretion to retain the treaties in force and thus make them part of the national law of the Ukraine, without the need to amend the constitution. jagemamerka Response...This is a most useful exchange on some of the most vexing issues of our time and which will make the quest for international justice the richer: it doesn't matter who wins or looses for now. Hostage Response... it doesn’t matter who wins or looses...

...is not a man known for sticking to his word. Even more, the conflict was escalating and the humanitarian situation was deteriorating even before the ICC drama began in July, with no apparent opening for any kind of way out, messy or otherwise. This recent history explains why Kleinman’s response to Michelle’s question was a non-answer: she was asking him to explain his long-term solution for Darfur, not his short-term solution. And his response was… silence. That is an unacceptable position for someone who so savagely criticizes anyone who dares...

not legal." If you can find a legitimate group to recognize then you might be able to cast your intervention as being necessary and perhaps even moral (and leave legal questions for afterwards). JordanPaust Response... Jens: article 52 expressly recognizes the possibility of "regional action" and Art. 53 only applies if the S.C. gets their act together. The S.C. engages in "enforcement action." Ash Response... Syria has been isolated by most of the international community for so long, how does the west expect to know what the best direction is...

...to Microsoft, of course, Microsoft alone is in possession of this information. It has been days and Microsoft has not offered this background information to the public. Tell us, then, (1) what Chinese authority contacted Microsoft about Mr. An Ti; (2) did they order or request the blog be shut down; (3) what legal justification did they provide; (4) what was Microsoft's response; (5) what was Microsoft legal counsel's response; (6) did Microsoft legal counsel agree with this assessment that a national law had been broken; (7) what notice did...

“the threat or use of force” in Article 2(4), it permits the exercise of self-defense only in response to an armed attack, not to threats of force or acts that constitute uses of force but that do not amount to armed attacks. Although it has not directly addressed the doctrines of anticipatory or preemptive self-defense, the case law of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) supports this reading of the Charter. In the Nicaragua Case, the Court called an armed attack the “condition sine qua non” for using force in...

...Amnesty International, however, disagrees: the BBC quotes Marek Marczynski, the head of the organization’s International Justice campaign, as claiming that the OTP’s decision “breaches the Rome Statute which clearly states that such matters should be considered by the institution’s judges.” I think Marczynski is wrong about that: nothing in the Rome Statute says that the judges get to decide whether an entity qualifies as a state for purposes of jurisdiction, at least in the first instance. The problem is that nothing in the Rome Statute specifically entrusts that decision to...

...pretty good Navy. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Letter_of_marque Richard Response... Anyone interested in US naval doctrine regarding the law of naval warfare should look at the Commander's Handbook on that subject, http://www.nwc.navy.mil/cnws/ild/documents/1-14M_(Jul_2007)_(NWP).pdf. It's a tri-service (USN/USMC/USCG) publication and covers the use of force across the spectrum of maritime contingencies, including piracy. Rob Isn't the British order to ignore pirates a violation of UNCLOS? Bandit Meanwhile, the British have instructed their navy to ignore pirates, out of the remarkable fear that any captured Somali pirates might have asylum claims on metropolitan Britain. As we all...

Int'l L.J. 533, 545-47 (2002). How about collective self-defense at the request of a new regime in parts of Libya and/or self-determination assistance? See id. at 547-48. Jordan Response... of course, I meant "Arab" League -- can't always type correctly Kenneth Response... See resolution 688 (1991) and following no-fly zone over Iraq to protect Kurds and Southern Iraq against Saddam Hussein, because of ensuing humanitarian situation. Perhaps no firm legal basis, but considered legitimate with some legal backing. Jordan Response... Yes, that was an implied authorization for the no fly...