...by the editors, and so forth. The journal may even have a policy never to publish such
response pieces, while of course allowing for criticism of previously published work in separate, self-contained articles. Bad idea? Probably. Out of bounds? No, as there are plenty of other avenues of expressing legitimate disagreement. Similarly, with Lawfare, you can always write a post in
response on OJ, I can write one on EJIL Talk, somebody else can create their own blog, use Face
book or whatever. I just don't see why you think that...