Search: Affective Justice: Book Symposium: A Response

fierce discussion, popularly referred to as the “peace versus justice debate”. This debate not only animated domestic politics but also the international discourse grappling with the effects of pursuing international criminal justice on the establishment of peace. The debate on the relationship between peace and justice largely remains harshly dichotomous and black-and-white. Either international criminal justice fundamentally disrupts the potential for creating peace or it is an absolute necessity for it. The attempted middle-ground which calls the peace-justice dichotomy “false” rarely offers any explanation as to why it’s false. Northern...

that the OTP has always rejected. Moreover, even if feasibility of investigation is relevant to whether opening an investigation is in the interests of justice, it is anything but clear that the PTC is entitled to substitute its assessment of feasibility for the OTP’s. It is exceptionally clear that the PTC has engaged in de novo review of the OTP’s determination that there are not “substantial reasons to believe that an investigation would not serve the interests of justice.” Even if reviewing the interests of justice is appropriate — as...

...given Justices Scalia and Thomas some pause, rather than encouraging them to strike forth so boldly. What is of critical importance, however, is that the Cato argument found favor with only those two Justices. Even Justice Alito, who joined Justices Scalia and Thomas on their other constitutional argument (see below), expressly declined to join this part of Justice Scalia’s opinion. That ought to sound the death knell for this misbegotten argument. b. Limiting the Power of the President and the Senate to Enter Into Treaties The Necessary and Proper Clause...

My thanks to Dave Glazier, Detlev Vagts, Roger Clark, and Devin Pendas for their insightful comments on my book. At the risk of sounding like I’ve plagiarized my response at EJIL: Talk!, I find it difficult to respond to those comments, because I almost completely agree with them. But I’ll give it a shot… Glazier My basic response to Dave’s comments is delight – I’m glad he finds the book useful for his own work, which is the highest compliment an author can receive. He does not offer any substantive...

going to answer to Justice Breyer, that the court of appeals does have the right to determine whether to the extent the Constitution and the laws of the United States are applicable, whether such standards and procedures, such as CSRT, are — – to make the determination — are consistent with the Constitution – GENERAL CLEMENT: Yes, JusticeJUSTICE KENNEDY: — that’s provided in the MCA. GENERAL CLEMENT: It absolutely is…. Fourth Exchange (p. 54): JUSTICE BREYER: …. [Y]ou could have the best procedure in the world, and they’re...

...parts of the book and, on top of that, an additional question that relates to the entirety of my argument. It is this overarching issue that I turn to in the next section. The big question: Is there such a thing as “internationalized armed conflict”? Several commentators have expressed some doubts about the legal valence of the central concept of the book. I am the first to admit that there is some conceptual confusion surrounding the notion of internationalized armed conflicts—something I discuss in detail in the book (pp. 24–28)....

as follows* Monday, March 31, 2014: Response and Sur-response to Anthea Roberts, State-to-State Investment Treaty Arbitration: A Hybrid Theory of Interdependent Rights and Shared Interpretive Authority, 55 Harv. Int’l L.J. 1 (2014). Response authored by Martins Paparinskis. Tuesday, April 1, 2014: Response and Sur-response to Monica Hakimi, Unfriendly Unilateralism, 55 Harv. Int’l L.J. 105 (2014). Response authored by Tim Meyer. Wednesday, April 2, 2014: Response and Sur-response to Gregory H. Shill, Ending Judgment Arbitrage: Jurisdictional Competition and the Enforcement of Foreign Money Judgments in the United States, 54 Harv. Int’l...

...Study of Humanitarian Law , Royal University of Law and Economics since 2017, whose research concerns the transitional justice process in Cambodia, including victim participation and genocide education of the young generation. Julie Bernath is a senior researcher at swisspeace and the University of Basel, whose book ‘The Khmer Rouge Tribunal: Power, Politics and Resistance in Transitional Justice’, will be published in 2023 with The Wisconsin University Press.] On 22 September 2022, 150 civil parties attended the final hearing of the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia (ECCC), which...

...justice scholarship already, including Sarah Nouwen’s book Complementary in the Line of Fire, Carsten Stahn and Mohamed El Zeidy’s edited volume The International Criminal Court and Complementarity, and articles by Kevin Jon Heller (see here and here) and William Schabas. De Vos’s book ultimately succeeds in this endeavour by grounding his engagement with the question of complementarity in a novel perspective, namely, by examining the multiple socially constructed meanings of complementarity and their respective implications for building domestic criminal justice systems. The goal of this brief contribution to the symposium...

[Agatha Verdebout is a Senior Researcher at Groupe de recherche et d’information sur la paix et la sécurité (GRIP).] I would like to start by thanking all the contributors for taking the time to read and review the book, as well as Alexandra Hofer and Opinio Juris for their interest in my work and the effort they have put into organising this written symposium. I am grateful for their comments, suggestions, questions and invitations to elaborate on some of the claims I make in Rewriting Histories.  Reading the reviews confirmed...

...reason that we invited a few scholars and practitioners to reflect on the themes covered by the book. We also invited Oumar Ba to respond to the observations of the contributors. We are very grateful to the contributors and to Oumar Ba for participating in this symposium despite the very disruptive effect that the global COVID-19 pandemic has had on professional and personal lives. We are also grateful to OpinioJuris for hosting this symposium. We hope that this symposium will stimulate enriching reflections on the themes covered by the book....

To close the symposium, Diego García Sayán, Special Rapporteur on the Independence of Judges and Lawyers, will reflect on the importance of having women in the judiciary, while Viviana Krsticevic, member of GQUAL, will note how the current moment represents an opportunity to achieve gender parity in international justice. Conclusion When GQUAL was launched, we did not envision that its objectives could not be met in an initial period of five years. Yet, women are still not participating in the decision-making processes of international justice on equal terms. We still...