Logo Logo Logo Logo Logo

In association with the International Commission of Jurists

  • Topics ↓
    • General
    • Use of Force
    • International Criminal Law
    • International Humanitarian Law
    • International Human Rights Law
    • Environmental Law
    • Trade & Economic Law
    • Law of the Sea
    • National Security Law
    • Foreign Relations Law
    • Organizations
  • Regions ↓
    • Africa
    • Asia-Pacific
    • Europe
    • Latin & South America
    • Middle East
    • North America
  • Announcements ↓
    • Events
    • Calls for Papers
    • Jobs
  • Symposia ↓
    • Books
    • Articles
    • Themes
  • Media ↓
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Contributors
  • Submissions
  • About
  • Donate
  • Fresh Squeezed! Podcast
  • Topics ↓

    • General
    • Use of Force
    • International Criminal Law
    • International Humanitarian Law
    • International Human Rights Law
    • Environmental Law
    • Trade & Economic Law
    • Law of the Sea
    • National Security Law
    • Foreign Relations Law
    • Organizations
  • Regions ↓

    • Africa
    • Asia-Pacific
    • Europe
    • Latin & South America
    • Middle East
    • North America
  • Announcements ↓

    • Events
    • Calls for Papers
    • Jobs
  • Symposia ↓

    • Books
    • Articles
    • Themes
  • Media ↓
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Contributors
  • Submissions
  • About
  • Donate
  • Fresh Squeezed! Podcast

Author: Margarita S. Ilieva

10 Oct

C. v. Romania: A ‘Sensitive and Reverent’ But Gender-Blind Standard for Assessment of Sexual Harassment Cases? The ECtHR’s Long and Winding Road to Gender-Responsiveness in Sexual Predation Contexts

[Margarita S. Ilieva is an international human rights litigator, providing analysis and capacity building for institutions including the EU Fundamental Rights Agency, OSCE, the Academy of European Law, Equinet, and others.] In C. v. Romania (30.08.2022), the Court examined the authorities’ response to a sexual harassment at work complaint. It deemed the response ‘insensitive and irreverent’, and otherwise flawed, and declared a procedural violation of Article 8...

Margarita S. Ilieva | 0 Comments
Recent Posts
  • Legal Gaps in Protecting Children’s Mental Health in Armed Conflicts: Insights from Ukraine, Gaza, and Iran
  • Akhmad, et.al v Bumble Bee Foods: Corporate Accountability for Forced Labour in High Seas Fisheries – Preliminary Observations
  • In Memoriam: Judge Lennart Aspegren (1931–2026)
  • Symposium on Advancing Effective and Comprehensive Reparation for Victims of the War in Ukraine: No Uncharted Territory – The ICC’s and TFV’s Role in the Ecosystem of Justice for Victims in Ukraine
  • Symposium on Advancing Effective and Comprehensive Reparation for Victims of the War in Ukraine: Asset Recovery for Ukraine – The Long Road

© Opinio Juris | Design by Open & Honest | In association with the International Commission of Jurists