Logo Logo Logo Logo Logo

In association with the International Commission of Jurists

  • Topics ↓
    • General
    • Use of Force
    • International Criminal Law
    • International Humanitarian Law
    • International Human Rights Law
    • Environmental Law
    • Trade & Economic Law
    • Law of the Sea
    • National Security Law
    • Foreign Relations Law
    • Organizations
  • Regions ↓
    • Africa
    • Asia-Pacific
    • Europe
    • Latin & South America
    • Middle East
    • North America
  • Announcements ↓
    • Events
    • Calls for Papers
    • Jobs
  • Symposia ↓
    • Books
    • Articles
    • Themes
  • Media ↓
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Contributors
  • Submissions
  • About
  • Donate
  • Fresh Squeezed! Podcast
  • Topics ↓

    • General
    • Use of Force
    • International Criminal Law
    • International Humanitarian Law
    • International Human Rights Law
    • Environmental Law
    • Trade & Economic Law
    • Law of the Sea
    • National Security Law
    • Foreign Relations Law
    • Organizations
  • Regions ↓

    • Africa
    • Asia-Pacific
    • Europe
    • Latin & South America
    • Middle East
    • North America
  • Announcements ↓

    • Events
    • Calls for Papers
    • Jobs
  • Symposia ↓

    • Books
    • Articles
    • Themes
  • Media ↓
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Contributors
  • Submissions
  • About
  • Donate
  • Fresh Squeezed! Podcast

Author: Margarita S. Ilieva

10 Oct

C. v. Romania: A ‘Sensitive and Reverent’ But Gender-Blind Standard for Assessment of Sexual Harassment Cases? The ECtHR’s Long and Winding Road to Gender-Responsiveness in Sexual Predation Contexts

[Margarita S. Ilieva is an international human rights litigator, providing analysis and capacity building for institutions including the EU Fundamental Rights Agency, OSCE, the Academy of European Law, Equinet, and others.] In C. v. Romania (30.08.2022), the Court examined the authorities’ response to a sexual harassment at work complaint. It deemed the response ‘insensitive and irreverent’, and otherwise flawed, and declared a procedural violation of Article 8...

Margarita S. Ilieva | 0 Comments
Recent Posts
  • Symposium on the Global Sumud Flotilla: The Mechanics of Legal Accumulation – From the Namibia Precedent to the Sumud Flotilla
  • Symposium on the Global Sumud Flotilla: Ecocide as Genocide – The curious disappearance of the Palestinian olive tree
  • Symposium on the Global Sumud Flotilla: The Legal Architecture of Maritime Abduction – The Global Sumud Flotilla and Israel’s Legal Fictions
  • Symposium on the Global Sumud Flotilla: The Gaza Blockade as an Instrument of Genocide – International Law, Global Sumud Flotilla, and Normalization of Illegality
  • Symposium on the Global Sumud Flotilla: A Sea of Struggle – Reimagining Legal Resistance in a Violent Order

© Opinio Juris | Design by Open & Honest | In association with the International Commission of Jurists