Logo Logo Logo Logo Logo

In association with the International Commission of Jurists

  • Topics ↓
    • General
    • Use of Force
    • International Criminal Law
    • International Humanitarian Law
    • International Human Rights Law
    • Environmental Law
    • Trade & Economic Law
    • Law of the Sea
    • National Security Law
    • Foreign Relations Law
    • Organizations
  • Regions ↓
    • Africa
    • Asia-Pacific
    • Europe
    • Latin & South America
    • Middle East
    • North America
  • Announcements ↓
    • Events
    • Calls for Papers
    • Jobs
  • Symposia ↓
    • Books
    • Articles
    • Themes
  • Media ↓
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Contributors
  • Submissions
  • About
  • Donate
  • Fresh Squeezed! Podcast
  • Topics ↓

    • General
    • Use of Force
    • International Criminal Law
    • International Humanitarian Law
    • International Human Rights Law
    • Environmental Law
    • Trade & Economic Law
    • Law of the Sea
    • National Security Law
    • Foreign Relations Law
    • Organizations
  • Regions ↓

    • Africa
    • Asia-Pacific
    • Europe
    • Latin & South America
    • Middle East
    • North America
  • Announcements ↓

    • Events
    • Calls for Papers
    • Jobs
  • Symposia ↓

    • Books
    • Articles
    • Themes
  • Media ↓
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Contributors
  • Submissions
  • About
  • Donate
  • Fresh Squeezed! Podcast

Author: Leonie Steinl and Wenke Bruckner

29 Feb

Germany before the European Court of Human Rights: Finally Accountability for the Airstrike at Kunduz (and Beyond)?

[Dr. Leonie Steinl, LL.M. is a post-doctoral researcher at Hamburg University, where she works in a DFG-project on "Strategic Litigation Networks and Accountability for Gross Violations of Human Rights". Dr. Wenke Brückner currently works as a lawyer in Berlin, specializing in German and international criminal law. Both authors have previously worked on different aspects of the case of Hanan v. Germany for...

Leonie Steinl and Wenke Bruckner | 1 Comment
Recent Posts
  • A rejoinder to the incidental civilian harm debate, part II: the untenability of understanding incidental as ‘knowingly and willingly’ killing civilians (no matter how many) without ‘desire’, under ICL
  • A rejoinder to the incidental civilian harm debate, part I: the untenability of understanding incidental as ‘fortuitous’ killing of civilians (no matter how many) under IHL
  • What the First Conference on Transitioning Away from Fossil Fuels Means for the Duty to Co-operate
  • Unilateral Regulation Without Mirror Clauses? The Limits of the EU’s Brussels Effect in the EU–Mercosur Agreement
  • Symposium on the Global Sumud Flotilla: The Mechanics of Legal Accumulation – From the Namibia Precedent to the Sumud Flotilla

© Opinio Juris | Design by Open & Honest | In association with the International Commission of Jurists